You're making me sound like an arrogant fool Michael---which maybe I am---but not because of what I have written here.
Weiner got it right.
But only in the present tense. Please read what I wrote once again.
Martin I will not discuss, and you know the reason why.
Durga as Anapurna may be so for some people, it may not be so for others. Apart from my own experience, I can refer you to Ramseyer in respect of the manifestations of Uma in the context of Bali. Anapurna is not part of the equation in Bali-Hindu belief, to my knowledge.
The discussion has been about a jejeran from Islamic Jawa.The side trip into Bali is a diversion.
If the belief is that this jejeran is a representation of Durga, and this idea originated in the work of Martin Kerner, then let us see Martin's evidence or argument, or alternatively present an argument of your own.
I have not told you that anybody got anything wrong.
What I have said is that the specific question has not yet been settled.
This question relates to a jejeran from Islamic Jawa, it does not relate to the manifold interpretations of Hindu belief systems, nor can it be answered by unsubstantiated opinions.
I have provided an argument to support my opinion.
If you disagree with my opinion, please destroy my argument, and please stay within the context of the time and place of origin of the object under discussion.
I may be wrong, but this is yet to be demonstrated.
I understand that you have a lot on your plate at the moment, so there is no hurry for the evidence or argument to demonstrate that I need to change my opinion.
|