Ethnographic Arms & Armour - View Single Post

Henk · 27th May 2007, 09:22 AM

It is indeed a knights head above the coat of arms. The writing 1501 must be the date.
Unfortunately I must agree with Lew. It is a crudely made repro. A dagger of such age, even preserved very well, looks quite different.

27th May 2007, 09:22 AM	#7
Henk Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 1,209	It is indeed a knights head above the coat of arms. The writing 1501 must be the date. Unfortunately I must agree with Lew. It is a crudely made repro. A dagger of such age, even preserved very well, looks quite different.