Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ann Feuerbach
Hi all,
Just got back from a conference and will be reading the nature article soon. I have seen some work on nano structure in a 2004 article. History section in all these areas are bad. FYI wootz, only from 1795, not a real word, too bad it is used so much as it is so inaccurate and as no etymological roots.
 |
Thanks Ann.
Hope the conference was enjoyable, informative and productive. Like Andrew, I would welcome your suggestion for a better term than
wootz. Look forward to hearing your views about the possible significance of these fine sub-micronic structures that have been described recently.
Regards,
Ian.