Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nechesh
Rivkin, i'm glad you picked up on my sarcasm. Even 1400 yrs. ago is quite a long time. What actual proof do we have that any of the swords of Mohammed were ever really his swords at all? Hard to believe the gold and jeweled encrusted one saw any battles. I would think that a few generations past the death of Mohammed it might be very advantagious for a powerful Islamic leader to be able to produce one the "swords of the prophet" to strenghten his hold on power. Forgive me if i am speaking blasphamy here, but can we really be certain of anything, or are the swords of Mohammed purely a matter of faith?
As for the "Spear of Destiny", i was keeping it right next to that grail thingy....now where DID it get to?  |
Nechesh,
I don't think anyone is seriously positing that any of the swords in the Topkapi were
actually Mohammed's. However, they appear to be extremely fine and, presumeably, valuable and important artifacts in their own right.
But I do agree that confirmation of such extraordinary provenance would require a miracle.
