Ethnographic Arms & Armour - View Single Post

A. G. Maisey · 7th February 2013, 06:36 PM

You know, if we really wanted to get this thing up and running, it might be useful to harvest from old posts as a beginning strategy.

Its a simple thing to copy a pic, rework if necessary and then post again with a cross reference to the original post.

Since Richard generated this idea of a dedicated thread, I feel that the honour of carrying out this harvest should go to Richard.

I agree fully with David that this new thread should not degenerate into a bun fight over names, but I equally feel that where we have a name it should be given, however, not in isolation, but rather in a format that attaches the name to a source, for example:-

" According to Harsrinuksmo , P.123, this is pamor ron kates."

Any other opinions would be required to be posted in a similar format, that way we won't waste time and effort with endless conflicting opinions that have no solid foundation.

7th February 2013, 06:36 PM	#14
A. G. Maisey Member Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 6,991	You know, if we really wanted to get this thing up and running, it might be useful to harvest from old posts as a beginning strategy. Its a simple thing to copy a pic, rework if necessary and then post again with a cross reference to the original post. Since Richard generated this idea of a dedicated thread, I feel that the honour of carrying out this harvest should go to Richard. I agree fully with David that this new thread should not degenerate into a bun fight over names, but I equally feel that where we have a name it should be given, however, not in isolation, but rather in a format that attaches the name to a source, for example:- " According to Harsrinuksmo , P.123, this is pamor ron kates." Any other opinions would be required to be posted in a similar format, that way we won't waste time and effort with endless conflicting opinions that have no solid foundation.