Thread: Armour?
View Single Post
Old 26th September 2005, 10:45 PM   #62
Ahriman
Member
 
Ahriman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hungary
Posts: 72
Default

He was fighting... Semi-full contact. Overconfident. Not a very unusual thing here. A guy ordered greaves with knees because one of his friends lost his... patella, maybe? That piece of bone over the knee, I don't know it's english name. The surgery tool was the "spike" of a two-handed, rebated viking axe. Stupid people, we are... but as we have a few good armourers, more and more of these idiots realize that plate on vulnerable joints = life-long joint usage...

I bet you like Rubens, don't you?
That RA suit is nice, but it has HUGE links... And it seems rivetted.
Wait, I recall Ham telling us that mamluks used baydana as a primary defense... which means HUGE links... Ok, it's mamluk.
Did they ever fight europeans? Especially germans? Because this link size is EXTREMELY vulnerable to half-swording IMO.

Thanks for listing the reasons of my anti-lamellar mindset...
BTW, Norm wrote that there were samurai armours with long plates, opened only on one side, so the owner was helped into it by assistants who pulled it apart. Is it true? It seems quite a stupid thing to me, as the continuous opening-closing would stress the metal... which's not good.
Ahriman is offline   Reply With Quote