7th October 2010, 09:35 AM
|
#8
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
Hi Dom,
I was logical since I corrected to 1373 in my latest thread and I don't mind to be wrong but would like the confirmation from a Maly member just for my reference.
Best regards
Jean
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom
Hi Sajen
you are correct, it's 1272 that we should read
that way of writting is formal, and the script is conform
if the writing is "current" we could found the number 3 written as Jean thinks,
but here we are not in this case, it must be formal
if Jean, was logic  he could read 1373 and not 1372
any way, on my point of view it's a wrong interpretation ... sorry Jean
Best Regards
à +
Dom
|
|
|
|