Pappenheimer (and rapiers in general) hilt length
Good afternoon y'all. In having looked at several hundred pappenheimer and rapier images over the past month I've been intrigued by how much the length of the hilt seem to vary.
For example, in shayde78's recent wonderful thread on pappenheimer he posted the following image of his own sword (http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=25744) Quote:
Meanwhile my hand (I'm 6'3) seems to be dwarfed by the hilt on my own pappenheimer. http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/attach...1&d=1680453162 So my question is what is the reason for such a disparity in hilt sizes? I feel like if the purpose was for better sword balance then why not just change the pommel size? Or was this just to boost someone's ego by having the "bigger sword". |
I suspect that there are just variations, but possibly also driven by what you will be wearing on your hand. The C17th infantry swords I have (some hangers and a proto-mortuary sword) have small guards because I think the users would have bare hands or simple leather gloves. The cavalry weapons have bigger guards because I think they'd (ideally) be wearing thicker gauntlets or plate gauntlets if cuirassiers.
|
4 Attachment(s)
I have this thing which I suspect it could be a Swedish haudegen from the time of Lützen.
Measurements are something like 117cm total length, 93cm blade and 1495gr total weight. There is a thumb ring. The handle shows wire marks. The front edge seems to have been sharpened more often than the back. In spite of the huge size and weight, it handles nicely, specially with a gauntlet. It could be a Victorian monstruosity as well. |
Quote:
https://www.sabresempire.com/2012/01...armee.html?m=1 |
1 Attachment(s)
My hand (not very big) in my Pappenheimer. This has a rapier blade, so may have been for civilian use.
|
These things must have been a royal pain to lug around. The number of times day they must have gotten caught on a rail or doorframe is absurd.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You know, Spanish rapier scabbards used to have a coil at the bottom and a release mechanism at the mouth, so the blade literally jumped out of the scabbard. You could have a Spaniard of 1meter 60 trying to unsheath a 1meter 20 rapier. |
modern take on a Pappenheimer
3 Attachment(s)
I acquired this recently purely because it intrigued me and it was very cheap.
It was made by Pillin and Co. for a member of the Knights of Malta which were an off-shoot of the Knights of St John... apparently (see labels). The blade is from Thurkle with a T slug. Anyway, the point is this: the hilt is 8&1/4 inches top to bottom and the same from quillon tip to quillon tip. The pommel is huge and very heavy. On this 31 inch blade is is decidedly unbalanced. Pillin must have referenced a traditional example, copied the hilt but decided against a longer blade. ps The Thurkle history is an interesting one. |
It seems like all of these pommels could moonlight as doorknobs.
Is that a feature of all Pappenheimers? Mine has the balance just in front of the guard with a 38 inch blade but the pommel still seems unwieldy for such a thin blade. My next question is this: is there a description of what a Pappenheimer is from the 17th century? Or was this just a name applied by later academics to the style of this time period. If there is period references, what are the features they name? And what are the features accepted by modern academics of what a Pappenheimer is besides a "shell" style guard? |
History
This is all I know but I'm sure someone will have more... probably Jim.
This style of rapier is named for Field Marshal Gottfried Heinrich Graf (count) zu Pappenheim, Imperial Cavalry commander. A gilded pappenheimer rapier was carried by Swedish King Gustavus II Adolphus when he was killed at the Battle of Lutzen in 1632 and is preserved in the Stockholm Royal Armouries. Coincidentally, Field Marshal von Pappenheim was also killed in this battle. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:00 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.