Yet another Dha
I must admit: when a Dha is pretty, it is really beautiful.
Look at this: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...MEWA%3AIT&rd=1 The blade needs cleaning and is of yet unknown quality, but the silverwork is outstanding. |
I agree it has very nice silver work on it, as well as the carved ivory. But unless Maung Po Thein is a historical figure of import I think the price is unusually high. I have not had time to look him up yet. Perhaps Andrew, Ian or Mark will have heard of him
|
Quote:
|
reference?
The only reference I can find on "Maung Po Thein" is a reference to a forced labor villager from Win-ka-na village, Win-yae Township.
http://www.ibiblio.org/obl/docs/year...ed%20labor.htm |
I think it is not just over priced, more ridiculous. I work on a lot of silver objects and I am always puzzled at how sometimes only foil thin silver work, all be it quite pretty but basically very simple can send prices to dizzying heights. The repousse work on this is above average but is not anything that cannot be found on a lot of late 19th century silver jardinieres from Burma and other SE Asian countries. It looks as if the blade might clean up nicely. Tim
|
Puzzles me as to why Maung Po Thein is written in our alphabet and not in native script . :confused:
|
Burmese dha with Lao style silver work
Nice dha indeed, but the price is over the top by any standards.
The style of silver work is in the Lao tradition, with the segmented panels on the scabbard being characteristic of that style. It is still seen today on occasional high end contemporary Lao dha -- I have an example from the 1970s that is similar in style. The presence of English and Burmese inscriptions on the scabbard indicates a Burmese provenance during the period of the British colonial administration which was from the early 1880s to Burmese independence just after WWII. These "distinguished presentation swords" are not very common, are often dated and usually have an inscription about the valor and virtue of the recipient, although this one does not seem to have a date or inscription. The three previous examples I have seen were dated from about 1900 to 1930. Ian. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I truly love the silver work, especially the pommel end. I agree with Tim regarding the thinness of the silver sheet over some dha. That is why I have found some of this silver work easily folded, torn, crumpled, etc. It is less than 34 gauge, thicker than aluminum foil, but not by much.
|
Yeah, yeah, I am not a Dha-ologist, I know.
However, I can't see a single torn piece on the scabbard and the repousse is so detailed, with so many different levels of relief that, IMHO, the silver is not very thin. Similar detailing is seen on Kubachi silverwork and it is quite thick. Also, look at the engraving: it is rather deep . Maybe, this Dha is an exception to the rule. Sure it is overpriced, but we are not valuating it, are we? |
Quote:
Here are a few others: http://dharesearch.bowditch.us/Images/Image333.jpghttp://dharesearch.bowditch.us/Images/Image330.jpghttp://dharesearch.bowditch.us/Images/Image327.jpghttp://dharesearch.bowditch.us/Images/Image335.jpg |
Mark, lovely avatar you got there. ;) Beautiful artwork on the scabbards.
I might be turned from collecting keris to dha...(resisting the temptation). |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:47 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.