Bali keris restored
 

Here is an old Bali keris that I have restored. It had thick layer of black rust, barbarically cleaned on some places with a large file.
Mr. Alan Maisey has given me a splendid advice on blade cleaning and polishing – thank you Alan very much! I have followed it closely, first cleaning the blade from rust. It is interesting that on this step the golden inlay appeared.

After this I was polishing the blade seven months long :) (with many breaks really), got sore and cracked fingertips, but the result was pretty rewarding, especially after the etching. The etching and the Wrongko were made on Bali (I would like to thank Mr. Michael Wahle from Bali-Artshop for his help).
I would like to know more about this fascinating blade, so any comments are welcome. The blade is very massive – it is 1.8 cm thick near the Gonjo.

Tatyana, the guidance I gave to you was no more than I have given to many other people, however, you appear to have understood and followed my instructions to the letter, because the result you have achieved is excellent.I doubt that I could do any better than this myself.

Congratulations.

Impressive work! :)

A beautiful conservation Tatyana. brilliant !
Is this a smaller keris than the average of 16 - 18 inches ?
What a fantastic job you have done .
Bravo !!

Beautiful! It's happy to see the keris returned to its dignified state! :) Hopefully I have something to show about my own Bali keris in a couple of month's time. :)

Beautiful restoration. Well done. :)

:eek: Truly awesome work and an astonishing keris!

Thank you all for the kind words :)
It is a normal size Bali keris, about 40 cm blade lenght. I believe the large handle make it look smaller, but I have tried to match the handle and sheath size...

Hello Tatjana,

very nice keris and a good restoration job.
When I yesterday see this keris and read your words I have to remember my Bali keris I've bought 1994 in Klungkung. This keris have had also very bad corrosion and I've cleaned it also byself and polished it. What's funny that both look from the blade very similar. Your's have 11 luk, my only 7.

sajen

Thanks for sharing Sajen. These blades are pretty similar indeed. It is a pity that there seems to be no additional info on them...

Tatyana, what additional information are you seeking?

We cannot reliably date these blades, there is not as far as I am aware a parrallel Balinese system to the Javanese system of tangguh, so we cannot really classify them.

It is probably possible to give them a dhapur, in accordance with the data provided by Lalu Djelengga.

The pamor in both cases is a simple m'lumah style, that most people would call wos wutah.

Yours has the remnants of kinatah work, which probably indicates original ownership by a person with rank.

I doubt that there is much more that anybody could say about these blades --- except that they are very nice, very typical Balinese blades.

Alan these few lines of text are really what I've been looking for. This information may be evident to you and other advanced Keris collectors, but there are novices like me whom even this short description is extremely important. Thank you very much for your comments!

Hello Mr. Maisey,

isn't the pamor of my keris not a sort of a wengkon?
Here some closeups of the blade.

Regards,
sajen

I don't know that I'd be inclined to call it a wengkon. Yes, it has some characteristics of a wengkon, but we've still got that random pamor below the "wengkon" and the core of the blade.

To be frank, I prefer not to get too involved with the refined niceties of pamor types. I'm pretty relaxed about the whole thing. In the group of people with whom I associate in Jawa, most of whom are dealers, we tend to paint with a rather broad brush.This is somewhat different to the current collector attitude that wants to define and categorise to the Nth. degree. Amongst the people I mostly associate with, if we see anything that is any kind of random pamor, we call it wos wutah. What we call wos wutah, the bulk of collectors in Jawa would probably want to categorise into a multitude of sub-types.

Your blade looked at in cross section, has a core, a layer of random pamor, and one of the layers of contrasting material in that random pamor is marginally thicker than the others.

The question then must be asked:-

did the maker produce this pattern intentionally, attempting to create a wos wutah/wengkon pamor?

or was the folding of the pamor material less than expert and he finished up with a layer of contrasting material on the outside of the forging?

did he then realise that his blade was not going to be thick enough and he added a layer of iron to compensate?

A wengkon is a very difficult pamor to produce. It requires an enormous amount of both forge control and benchwork control. This keris might be the result of a conscious effort to produce a wengkon, but the control is far from good, so it might also be the result of error correction. Since none of us were there looking over the maker's shoulder, I'd say that we can take our own decisions on the matter.

From this case of view I would agree because the other side of the wilah is a random pamor wos wutah so it is obvious that this "wengkon" is a product of fortune. I am a collector too and sometimes wish to see something special. :rolleyes:

Maybe, but also maybe not.

There are several different ways that this blade could have gained the plain iron overlay to one face, the correction of error that I have already mentioned, or the failure to remove a protective plate used during production, or maybe --- just maybe --- the intentional production of a pamor tangkis.

Pamor tangkis requires that each blade face carry a different pamor.

An easy way to do this is to make an ordinary random pamor and then add to that on one blade face.

Pamor tangkis is regarded as a protective device against black magic.

We do not know exactly why this blade has this pamor, but there are several possibilities, some I have mentioned, but we could probably come up with additional ones also.