|
Crowns on Aceh weapons revisited
1 Attachment(s)
Dear all,
My main interest is in North Sumatran weapons of State / Status. These weapons in Aceh often have crowns. The website of John T. Crosby about the Peudeung has an interesting photo with a lot of crowns: http://home.comcast.net/~jtcrosby/Aceh.html Recently I found out that these came from the collection of a forum member: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ighlight=atjeh and that I actually own two of the pieces that are shown in the photo! For me a reason to revisit the theme of crowns and ask you to share you variation on Aceh crowns on sikin/rencong! Here is a start with my rencong with crowns. Will try to make a picture later on including the sikins and maybe some items from the collection of a friend. Regards, Erik |
Variations?? :-))
3 Attachment(s)
Hi Erik,
I guess it will be hard to place different variations, because you must almost have all of the variations by now... I can "only" put an image of my rentjong with three golden crowns and nice laminated blade, which seem not to be that rare when looking at your image...:D |
Quote:
The question is how rare they are. I would guess that orignally only about 1 in a 100 rencong would have had golden triple crowns - maybe less. The story still is that adat prescribed these golden crowns to be worn by nobility and local leadership (panglima's etc). |
Quote:
So many of those rare items in quantity and also in quality, that it will look for "non-collectors" like they are not rare.. |
Quote:
Regards, Erik |
Also the enamel is partly gone and partly still there...(could be because of use or age?)
As I can conclude from your image, the middle of your rentjong also misses the enamel partly. But what are the features you think they are older types? Is it the shape of the upper crown you can find back in the deep carving of the handle? Or are it the motifs on the golden crowns you are looking at? |
Well made crowns but relatively simple - a bit less refined and less detailed. Enamal is more coarse, less clear in colour and indeed often missing for the bigger part - maybe they did not have the right procedure yet? And the handles are of the dark type indeed almost always with the stripe carvings. The blades are of high quality - most often laminated. The others have often relatively simple blades that look good but more for status than use in my opinion (although some clearly show signs of use as well).
Regards, Erik Quote:
|
Quote:
Thank you very much for your explanation. So the sikin with three golden crowns you bought on the last keris-fair this year in Bronbeek where we did meet, could be of the same age. That one also has that kind of less detailed crowns, like the " probably older" rencongs. But it is a fact that I was thinking often why there were pieces with almost all enamel gone, and pieces with all enamel that intact and very fine in the more refind carvings.... I did see the differences between them, but didn't think further what could be the reason. But I can imagine that age could be the factor! Regards, Maurice |
Most sikins I have seen are of the less detailed type and little remaining enamal - especially those with three crowns. I have seen one with great detail and perfect enamal in a private collection but it seems to be very rare.
The 3 sikins I have are all more or less of the "simple" type and the one you mention for sure (although it also has gold inlay in the metalwork) This might have to do that people of status (nobility and local authorities)were still allowed to wear a rencong by the end of the 19th century as it was a part of their status attire. These probably are the later types. The wearing of sikins was already prohibited by that time. According to a source high quality rencong and sikin were already a rare find by 1920 as there was little to no production so mainly heirlooms. Well this is at least my hypothesis based on the info above. Quote:
|
3 Attachment(s)
Don't know if this will be helpful to the discussion but here is my gold mounted sikim anyway:
|
2 Attachment(s)
Very nice one Battara!
These sikins with triple crown are quite rare in my opinion - and this is what to me seems to be the early variation. There is also a variation with double golden crowns that only does seem to exist in sikins - I have not seen a rencong yet with that type of crown. Here pictures of my triple crown and the type of double crown I described above. Regards, Erik Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Indeed there a lots of sources both old and new with descriptions of crowns but none that help place them in time or give details about the "meaning" of the different types of crowns in respect to the wearers.
Quote:
|
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
I have no exact age, but it looks as old as any of their pieces. :shrug: |
W :eek: W! All that gold inlay - hard stuff to carve especially into steel like that......
|
This is really interesting and as stated before I have not seen anything like it ever before! Rare combination of crown/inlay and type of handle too! I go to Bronbeek quite often but cannot remember seeing this baby?
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
This is another picture from this article by the former head collection of Bronbeek, Dirk Staats. (notice the Kupiah) This rentjong with the forked handle, with the incissions and also the rare type of crown + inlays is indeed something I have not seen before. It would be intersting to know if Bronbeek has provenance on their pieces. |
They have been rebuilding the museum for some time. It reopened with the new set up last week. Admittance will be free till October first. Will give an update here after I have there again.
In the previous set up there were hardly any Aceh weapons on display at all! And getting info about their items or getting them out of the depot was next to impossible during the last year and a half because of that rebuilding. Will see if it is easier to get info from them now.... I have some items there on display as well (well I will have to see if they are still on display...) - they only seem to keep the basic details of the donator but nothing about the historical background is what I learned at that time. Quote:
|
Why would this type of double crown be so rare on rencong?
I have three sikins of which two have this type of double crown and one a triple crown. I have 5 rencong with crowns (first picture in this thread) and none has a double crown like that. It seems to be very rare in rencong (I had not seen one before this picture). Any input on the reasons for this would be welcome! My logic says that if I had a sikin witth double crown I would also wear a rencong with double crown. I'll have to look closely at old pictures to see if this is the case or not.... Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
I think this one would be a nice addition in this thread.
It is a beautifull sikin that was in the personal collection of late Bisseling, who was a conservator of the Leiden Museum. It is now in a friend's collection, and already a long time impossible for me to get it rid from him.;) It has the same type of crown as discussed, but the upper crown is suassa instead of gold. This sikin has everything. Attractive, gold, suassa, silver, ivory....you name it! :eek: Maurice |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Nice example. but the crown type with suasa is found on both sikins and rencong. (see example). Personally I like this type a lot, but technically it is much simpler, so I would assume it had also less status. statistics is not my hobby, but my gut feeling says that this type of crown must have occured on sikins and rencong more or less in equal numbers. The type that Erik means with the double crown made entirely from gold alloy with the elaborate carvings is a type of crown that I have seen on various sikins, but the only rencong I ever saw was in this Bronbeek article. All together I don't think that we can get to the bottom of the meaning of the various crowns. You would need museum details not only with date of collection. but in fact also info on the rank / status of the original owner... I am afraid that KNIL soldiers often took these weapons at a monent when they where not able to ask the former owner about their status. Not the prettyest time in our history. :o Best regards, Willem |
Hi Willem,
That is correct when you are talking about the golden crowns and I agree about the higher status of gold in comparrison with suassa. I have images enough of sikins with one, two and three golden crowns. It is also correct that the one from the Bronbeek article is the only rentjong that I also know with this variation of crown. But I posted this one, because this is the only sikin I know with a golden crown and this suassa crown on top. I have seen it on rentjongs, but not on sikins.. But your image is the second one I see...:D Kind Regards, Maurice Quote:
|
This is a beautiful example and a very rare one too.
This type of handle (hulu peusangan) and sheath are rarer than the common sikin. And the ones with crowns are even rarer again. Would not mind having one like that myself....:) Quote:
|
About the gold used on the double and triple crowns. Two collectors I know tested the gold on several crowns in their collection - all were made of a higer grade of gold than 14k!!!
So it does make some sense that many of these were harvested over time. I can imagine that up to recent times the gold was relatively of higher value that the "art". Quote:
|
Quote:
Who won't????:D But I am allready happy that I am able to hold and admire it every time when I visit the owner.;-) |
Quote:
And they where around in WW 2. Food was scarce, sigarets and coffee where hard to get and than you find this piece of useless gold fixed to an old sword that was also not very usefull. |
There are quite a few of these harvested around - although still rare items.
Last week I saw a rentjong for sale with gold inlay and that had clearly had triple crowns and also the back part of the handle covered in gold - like the one left in the first photo in the thread. It must have been an incredible piece when it was complete.... Quote:
|
Where is this rencong?
Anyway, it would be of higher status to have 14k+ over swassa. Back then the moulding of the metal was not the chore like it is today. |
Chore = daily routine.
No, I can not imagine how they would make such crowns with only charcoal/wood fire. The crowns are not solid and they are made with much detail. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.