![]() |
Quote:
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=7035 |
Quote:
Hello Marco, thank you. :) I still think that it is gembal jati (teak burl wood). Regards, Detlef |
Quote:
I think that the both hilts from this thread are recent. Regards, Detlef |
Thanks Detlef,
Do you know where i can find a picture of a cenangan? regards, Ben |
Quote:
;) :shrug: Regards, Detlef |
2 Attachment(s)
The cenangan form is scarce. I suspect it is a pretty recent form, and a development and simplification of the gerantim form.
The two cenangan in Harley's link are recent, and the only photos I could find of cenangan hilts are also over-blown recent ones. Essentially, the cenangan is the gerantim without the sprout on top. Pictured is a gerantim --- with sprout--- and the same hilt with the sprout painted out, which makes it a cenangan. Ben, this would be an easy hilt for you to use as a model:- reduce the raised parts that I commented on previously, and give them a bit of a curve, and you've just about done the job. The checkering is not necessary, this is the only Bali hilt I've seen that had checkering. Re the wood:- yes, it is jati gembol. |
1 Attachment(s)
I am glad I'm not the only one that couldn't find it :D
Yes the gerantim is close to what i have now, and the rest is easy to adjust. But now I know what it looks like, i have found this picture, is that the cenangan? |
Yes, but modern and not particularly good quality.
|
Quote:
If not i am going for the gerantim. Thanks Mr Maisey. |
No, gerantim was not more common on Lombok. In past times it was a hilt normally used by the nobility of Bali, most especially in the form which was wrapped with woven gold.
Ben, you cannot convert your present almost cenangan into a gerantim, because then the proportions will definitely be wrong. If you want to do gerantim you'll need to start again and take account of the sprout on top, however, a gerantim out of plain wood seems to me to just a little unfitting. You could bind what you have with twine and have a loncengan, but although these are not out of place on Bali, they were more common on Lombok. Or you can slightly modify what you have a finish up with a pretty acceptable cenangan. |
I am sorry Mr Maisey, but i meant the gerantim that you adjusted, without the sprout, and there was my mistake, then is was a cenangan :o
Maybe i start again with a new one, and make the top, middle, en bottom apart, that way i always can change the proportions, and i think it's nicer with a difference in grain. But we'll see. regards, Ben |
Thanks Ben. Understood.
|
4 Attachment(s)
Some more specimens of cenangan style hilts having some age.
Best regards |
Quote:
|
Thanks Jean,
They are much better looking then the ones i found. In the last 2 pictures you can see swastika's in the engraving! regards, Ben |
1 Attachment(s)
Here two more, again taken from the book "Keris Bali Bersejarah".
|
Quote:
Regards |
Quote:
The second hilt made from bone has a turtle skin cover, and the first one is made from bone and black horn. Best regards Jean |
Thank you Detlef,
The one on the right is very nice! Jean, It was kind a strange to see that, but now i get it, thanks for the explanation! regards, Ben |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Actually Ganesh adopted the svastika as one of his symbols.
The symbol itself has existed in Hindu belief for very much longer than Ganesh, and in Hindu belief generally it is understood as a positive sign; since Ganesh is the diety who is concerned with beginnings and success, it is fitting that this symbol should have been adopted for use by Ganesh. Ganesh has probably only existed as a Hindu deity since around the 3rd or 4th century current era, and the sect of Ganapatya where Ganesh is recognised as the supreme deity did not arise until about the 800's or 900's. In Hindu belief we say "svastika", not "swastika". The root is Sanscrit:- "asti" which means "it is", a positive affirmation. I've forgotten the "su" and "ka" meaings, but I think "su" might be an intensifier, and "ka" indicates the word form. |
Hello, this swastika ornamentation is more commonly known as "patra Cina" in Bali. Thanks :)
|
1 Attachment(s)
Now guys, this is where i am now, the hilt is to thin, the length is in my opinion ok, also i think there must be some engraving on the middle piece, or some raised sections like the picture on the right from Detlef, so i must make a new one.
I've made sheath dark because i didn't like the light color with the pelet, but i can adjust it to lighter or darker. regards, Ben |
I've seen many genuine Bali ensembles that are worse than this. Ben. You've done a good job.
If you feel that you need to do the hilt again, may I suggest that you very carefully study the proportions of any published examples you can find and try to copy those proportions? My feeling is that hilt may be a whisker too long. |
Thanks Mr Maisey, that is a very big compliment!
When i looked at it in real live, it seemed OK to me, but in the picture i does look a bit to long. It's no problem to get the proportions of the picture when you got the height, but i now have the reference of this one, and a couple of nice examples! If i get it right i shall post a picture here. Thanks everyone for helping out! regards, Ben |
Hi Harley,
great job you have done! :) :cool: The handle look a little bit to big/long but still ok! Regards, Detlef |
Very nice result, :)
|
1 Attachment(s)
Thanks Guys,
Kind of stupid of me, i had made this hilt in sections, now i have shorted it a bit, let me now what you think. I am still gonna make a new one, but if this is more in the direction, it's easier to get the proportion. regards, Ben By the way, this is not the original blade, thats why it don't correspond with the middle :D |
Look much better! :)
Regards, Detlef |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:06 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.