![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 66
|
![]()
Any ideas on this one would be great, it is a complete piece but minus scabbard, 64 cm total, horn hilt scales, a typical of its type but any ideas on age, for me it is first half of the 20thc, but could be wrong, open to any ideas.
![]() ![]() Last edited by Maj-Biffy Snodgrass; 26th May 2023 at 08:57 PM. Reason: pics failure to laod |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 106
|
![]()
I like your Khyber knife. It is always difficult to talk about their age. But I think it might be late 19th or early 20th century
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 66
|
![]()
Thanks Khan, I think you are bang on right with your idea on its age.
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,894
|
![]()
Major, I like the range of weapons you post, and I always wonder what observations you might already have on them as sort of a benchmark for those who will be commenting.
This is of course obviously a 'Khyber knife' which is a colloquial term used to specify these typically large blades knives, which are more of a short sword. The term 'Khyber knife' is actually a bit of British 'Hobson-Jobson' which is the British soldiers vernacular during the Raj in india. The term actually was used collectively including the pesh kabz , which was a smaller dagger with recurved blade and its variations, which would include the 'choora' and the 'karud'. These were not forms in themselves but variations of the pesh kabz, though these dialectic terms became applied to them, again through attempts by collectors to find distinct classifications. The so called Khyber knife in this parlance rather gained its own identity with the unusual Hobson-Jobson term 'salawar yataghan'; silliwar yataghan; which was an amalgam of the locally prevalent term for these 'selavah'. This was a Persian term, with the profound influences frm there which were prevalent in these regions as throughout India. The 'pesh kabz' itself had Persian origins from the Safavid dynasty in the 17th century. The British then rather bizarrely added the 'yataghan' denominator inexplicably to these huge 'Khyber Knives', as these had nothing more to do with the Ottoman yataghan than they did with being knives. The period for this example is of course safely placed in the late 19th into early 20th century, and these traditional weapons were used traditionally by virtually all of the Khyber associated tribes. While it may be possible to determine some tribal connection, it would seem this is an exception and I would be interested to know if anyone out there might point out examples of such. Otherwise, we can safely say this example is 'of the type' used by the Waziris, Afridis, Mahsud , Shinwari et al who dominate the formidable defile in Afghanistan notoriously known as 'the Khyber Pass" in the 19th century into the 20th and during the 2nd and 3rd Afghan Wars 1879-1919. These blades were held sacred by tribesmen, and when many tribesmen became part of tribal levys to police regions for the British Army, they kept their blades which were remounted with sword bayonet style hilts in the regulation fashion. "...they have taken the oath of the Brother in Blood on fire and fresh cut sod; on the hilt and the haft of the Khyber Knife, and on the wondrous names of God". KIPLING, "The Ballad of East and West". |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 425
|
![]()
What criteria might one use in assigning an approximate date to these, and other undated, Afghan edged weapons?
Criteria available from photographs would be useful, as well as indicators seen in-hand. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 66
|
![]()
Khyber knives.
Good info Jim and I'll keep them coming as and when I have new pieces to show for as long as I manage to stay here, I must admit that I do not know much about these large afghan knives, except that they look like giant chefs knives to me and that I would not like to meet the pointy end of one ![]() That said I have had quite a few over the years and one in wootz. This one I will etch though and show pics if anything nice pops out, always a chance it will be a good pattern welded one. be well all. ![]() ![]() Ps, as you will see i have changed my avatar. Last edited by Ian; 5th June 2023 at 03:58 PM. Reason: Removal of further inflammatory complaints and general whining |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,167
|
![]()
"Salawar Yataghan" may refer to the ones that have a slight 'S' curved spine, like mine below. Even tho the edge is essentially straight. I include another with a short steel grip that looks more yataghany, tho still T-spined. I have read that in spite of that nasty looking point, they were almost entirely used for slashing cuts, according to a British Military Doctor who treated the Brits kille or wounded by them.
Last edited by kronckew; 28th May 2023 at 07:29 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,894
|
![]() Quote:
Well noted Wayne! I spent years wondering what in the world 'salawar' meant until a while back when in was revealed that the word was actually 'selavah', the local term for these 'Khyber knives'. The British, in the Hobson-Jobson mode, took the word salevah, making it silliwar, then for some bizarre reason tacked on 'yataghan' to make it 'oriental-ish'. In a more colloquial manner the term 'Khyber knives' applied to the entire spectrum of these 'pesh kabz' family which included the variants which collectors have embellished with the terms 'choora' (chhura) and karud. As noted, slashing was the normal cut in tribal warfare, as far as use of the sword, and these sharp tips were most effective at doing so. These needle sharp points were effective in cases where penetrating the heavy quilted armor often worn, however as noted, thrusting was less likely as the user was left open without a weapon when it became embedded in the victim. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|