![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 461
|
![]()
I have acquired this Kris some time ago, it is one of my favourite pieces in my Kris collection but the only kris from the Philippines.
I believe this is a Maguindanao kris. It is a large blade, measuring 62cm the blade alone (77 from tip to heft finial ). It has 13 luks and shows signs of laminations ( which may be brought to show more but I am unsure on how to go about staining this kris). Weight about 1,1Kg (without the scabbard) It would have required a warrior to be well built to wield this sword. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,100
|
![]()
Does this blade have a separate gangya? In the photos it appears to just be a well incised line.
If you want to try to bring out the lamination i believe most folks use vinegar for a light etch. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 461
|
![]()
No the ganja is not separated.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,167
|
![]()
Milandro,
I think you will find that the gangya is, in fact, separate. It can be hard to tell without taking the piece apart. Almost all of the ones I have seen without a separate gangya were made of monosteel and the asang asang were either missing or very crudely made--definitely lower grade examples for the most part. Your kris is a nice one, and first half 20th C. IMO. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,100
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,200
|
![]()
I'll agree with Ian, with one addition - at the mounts appear a little more recent that that, and might even be later Maranao (Marawi) made mounts on this Maguindanao piece.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 461
|
![]()
Thank you all!
The " cutting" line appears to go through the last hole too, but this may be completely vestigial (I will ad up a picture at some point). Certainly cannot figure how to detach it , and the hilt is firm in place. So, I'd go with a vestigial line. If this was made into two different pieces fitting it together with such a precision would have been a work of art in itself. While researching this kris, on the forum and elsewhere, I found a large number of krises such as mine (or so they look to me) all indicated as Maguindanao from several auction houses (although the style of the picture taking appears to be very similar). Most if not all seemed (to me) to have some age to it and showed what appears to be a vestigial incision of the ganja. (am I at liberty to post pictures of these krises since all the auctions seem to have been completed?) I have seen that on previous thread here too there is a debate on the meaning of this cutting line ( real or vestigial) in terms of timeline. http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=22272 In this one there was a blade without even a vestigial line and it was probably bought in the '30 http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...separate+ganja Whichever the period when my kris was made, it wasn't made yesterday. I am very happy with my kris anyway, whether this was made early in the 20th century or later in the same century. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 640
|
![]()
Nice kris! I agree that it's likely Maguindanao. Unique hilt too.
I've seen around 2 archaic krises that don't have a separate gangya, both are in the Philippines. They both have round tangs. They've made me think about the widely accepted assumption that krises with separate gangya are automatically older. I jokingly call these as "mono-gangya" krises. There are also kalis (Sulu) being made nowadays that still have the separate gangya feature; they retained that knowledge even without outside intervention or Internet access, from what I understand. Of course I'll need more samples (and preferably disassembled archaic ones with mono-gangya) to prove this hypothesis that separate-gangya krises aren't necessarily older, but it's an interesting thing to consider, IMHO. Last edited by xasterix; 31st January 2023 at 11:33 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 640
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 461
|
![]() Quote:
Absolutely rigid blade and , I too have the feeling this is a Kris which wasn't meant to be used for decorative purposes. It is still very sharp and one has to handle it with care or you will quickly notice it. Given the weight and the length of this weapon, this would have been certainly wilded by someone whom knew what to do with it and had the necessary body mass and height. Last edited by milandro; 1st February 2023 at 08:06 AM. Reason: spelling |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,100
|
![]() Quote:
![]() This kris of mine i have always wondered about. The photo does not reveal a very faint line which on some days has led me to believe that there is a separate gangya. If that suspicion is true it has a rather amazingly seamless fit. But even if this is a one-piece blade i still remain confident that it is a pre-1930s kris. So i completely agree with you that we cannot date a kris with any certainty based solely upon whether the gangya is separate or not. But i also think it can still be useful as a general guide. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,100
|
![]()
I think i know what you mean by this José. The mounts appear to be post WWII to me, especially the one closest to the pommel. There may well have been added later.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 640
|
![]() Quote:
I have a trick to check if it's really separate gangya...I aim a heat gun around 4 inches above the line. After around 15 seconds at 400 Celsius setting, the galgal should start to melt, and if it's a 2-part kris, you'll see a telltale sign from the line. Either liquefied black ooze, or in other cases smoke (for those that only had minimal adhesive placed). There's always the risk of melting the adhesive at the hilt with this tactic, that's why I keep it at 15 seconds tops (usually it takes 30-70 seconds for the hilt's adhesive to wear off in my experience). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 999
|
![]() Quote:
Have you tried pouring hot water on it, sometimes that would reveal the welding pattern on the blade and ganya. As an alternative, warm household vinegar. Welding pattern will differ (in my experience), with the blade proper and ganya. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
I agree with Albert that reading the grain of the metal is the least intrusive approach to ascertain a separate katik/gangya (in most kris blades).
It's usually not necessary to fully clean the blade or even do a gentle polish (if only a window across the line). A gentle etch with hot water or some weak acid often enough does the trick. A good magnifying glass (10x loupe) is one of the best investments for avid collectors. Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]() Quote:
In worn, old blades, resin and nowadays often epoxy have been utilized to fill gaps that developed by material loss and can't be readily improved during blade maintenance/restoration. Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
Hello Milandro,
Your blade does strike me as certain 20th century blade: the waves are quite pointy and the base features with no apparent wear; also stylistically the thick gandik side does look quite modern (at a high level of craftsmanship for any later period though!). If I had to guess, I'd expect this to be an engraved "separation" line rather than real: The bold line (of consistent width and wide even for worn blades) and an invisible line at the distal greneng is a bit much to swallow, I'm afraid. As already pointed out, this is not a definite time indicator though. All fittings are typical for what got exported from Mindanao during the late 20th and early 21st centuries (often via Davao or Manila); presumably mostly Maranao work. They did this restoration/upgrading with whatever pieces became available: Certain antiques, vintage, more recent and apparently also new blades. The wooden pommel looks pretty good - while I tend towards a modern origin, I can't rule out a fully refurbished older piece from the pics. I understand that quite some of these pieces were for local use and not only export. Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
Hello Milandro,
Quote:
Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,167
|
![]()
Thanks, kai. Milandro, I missed your question. Kai is right, any item that has been definitely sold and is not up for resale can be discussed here and pictures posted.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,167
|
![]()
Milandro.
I took one of your pics, cropped and enlarged it, and rotated the pic to orient the gangya horizontally (as we usually view it). This is a good quality picture to consider whether the gangya is separate. The red arrows on the right indicate two areas that have been filed similarly. The top one is clearly not detached, so the bottom one is consistent with it also not being detached (although it may still be). The red circle on the left highlights the down-turned line that may be engraved or a line of separation. To my eyes it does not appear to pass through all structures, and is therefore not a line of separation, although cleaning off some of the oxidation within the small circular area (that a line of separation would have to pass through) would give you a definitive answer. Just some rolled up 220 grit sandpaper worked around in there would be sufficient to get a better look inside that drilled hole. You might also look to see if the lines on each side meet the greneng in the same place. . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,731
|
![]() Quote:
Also newer blades can be laminated and very substantial, see this piece from my own collection, blade is laminated, the kris is 73cm long and quite heavy with 890 gram. http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...highlight=kris Regards, Detlef |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 461
|
![]()
I won't try to detach the hilt or anything else on my kris.
![]() This is a 20th century blade, well , so be it. I just don't think this was made yesterday (in fact it was in the previous owner possession for over 50 years and the person wasn't a dealer and I know him to be a reliable person) and regardless of its age , I like it. Having said this, I would show some of the pictures of Moro krises (only/ the Ganja for the purpose of this discussion over ganjas and age), which seem to have some age to it and no obvious separation. I am not saying that my blade is therefore older, I am just showing what I've talked about and which was part of my research on such swords. The first and last picture look like the the ganjas are made of different metals compared to the rest of the blade BUT the separation (not just a line) is invisible, at least , to me, the other two don't have it or have just a vestigial separation while looking like krises of some age. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,731
|
![]()
I can understand it and I wouldn't do it as well.
![]() Nothing wrong by this, it's a nice kris and very collectable. Quote:
Regards, Detlef |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Leiden, NL
Posts: 477
|
![]()
It's very thin, but I can see a definite line of separation on the third one (and the first and second as well) on my monitor.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,100
|
![]() Quote:
That said i would say that at least two of these examples are deftly separate gangya and the other two most probably are. I agree with other statements made about the somewhat pointy luk and the newer looking fittings on your originally shown kris. This is indeed a nicely made sword and indeed worthy of collection. I hate making full assessments without having the weapon in hand, but if push can to shove i would place your kris as post WWII. No, it isn't new. But remember that 50 years ago is 1973. So i don't doubt that your friend could have had this kris that long and it still be a post WWII item. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
Hello Milandro,
I'm with David and the others here: All your examples with a high likelihood of having a separate katik/gangya with #3 being the only one leaving room for some doubt. As mentioned, Moro kris in good shape often have a hardly visible separation line. Those with an engraved line are actually often way too obvious! OTOH, those with separate piece hardly exhibit more than the example in Albert's post (#14) - the line then usually showing uneven corrosion/loss. Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|