![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]()
I decided to go out of the woods when I saw the discussion on the kalkan shield.
The kalkan is NOT an Ottoman shield. It's a Kurdish shield. It's the reason why you can find it in Turkey. The only similarity with Ottoman shield is the construction technique, the shield is made of straw. The Ottoman Turkish shield is different. Here is my kalkan and a Kurdish chap with a buckler / kalkan. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 847
|
![]()
Thumbs up !
The one you have is really nice ! ! I Like the raw iron-steel structure |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 841
|
![]()
Hello Kubur.
Thank you for interesting pictures. Please, could you post some pictures of a typical Ottoman shield ? And also how it was/is called (if not kalkan) ? Thank you. Best regards, Martin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]() Quote:
Yes I can. As you can see the Ottoman shield is much bigger 40 to 50cm. The wickerwork is much better on the Turkish Ottoman shields. Only the central part is made of iron, there is no radial bars around. Very interesting question about the name, because actually (as you know) the name is the same at least for the 19th century.... I don't know before the 19th c. and I don't know about the Kurdish name... If you google Ottoman shield you will see a lot of Kurdish kalkans. Why? Because they are very common and easy to find; and for a dealer it's always better to sell an Ottoman shield... I'm very happy with my tribal Kurdish shield. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 841
|
![]()
Thank you Kubur
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,189
|
![]()
If this is Kurdish, then what does a Turkish shied look like?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,189
|
![]()
Oh I see - I missed that. Thanks.
So the so-called Ottoman "Parade" shields are actually run of the mill Ottoman shields............... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]() Quote:
Where are the parade shields? Last edited by Kubur; 10th October 2020 at 11:31 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,189
|
![]()
Yeah they always call these "parade" shields. Not sure why........
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]() ![]() I can tell you why they call them parade. Because they are colourful and look fragile. If all the shields made of straw, wood or leather were parade shields, we won't have a lot of battle shields... The straw does the job, it will minimize the impact. Actualy it's the opposite the fancy full steel Persian and Indian shields were the parade shields. For the colour it's the same, our world is grey, the past was colourful. ![]() Plus I doubt that all the Ottoman shields captured during the siege of Vienna were parade shields. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
![]()
Seems to me that something that is both ornamented yet well-designed and crafted of proper materials can function just well on the battlefield as at a ceremonial gala or public display. Look at the late-medieval and Renaissance pavises from Europe, brightly emblazoned with the heraldic emblems relevant to the units which used them. if they were meant just for show by virtue of their colorful décor, they wouldn't have been made so massively (to withstand the force of longbow and crossbow projectiles).
So what are "proper materials" ? Spirally-wound and tightly bound rattan may seem flimsy to us, but keep in mind that it was widely used in cultures where the material was available or could be obtained through trade, and where cutting and projectile weapons were well-developed. Think most of SE Asia, Tibet, China, etc. I recall reading somewhere that Malay rattan shields were capable of standing up to blows from European naval cutlasses. And note this passage from Stone's Glossary...(p 557) : "Some of the shields that appear light and weak were much more effective at the time they were made than they appear to us with our knowledge of present-day weapons. Walllace, p 360, speaking of the Aru Islander's shields, says, 'Oner of the war shields was brought to us to look at. It was made of rattan and covered with cotton twist, so as to be both light, strong, and very tough. I should think it would resist an ordinary bullet' [italics are the author's]." One last thought -- in armies in which commanders often purchased their own equipment, the natural preference for high quality often included the desire for added decoration, and those were the days in which they typically led troops into the thick of the fray. Last edited by Philip; 12th October 2020 at 11:01 PM. Reason: biblio correction |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 54
|
![]()
Hi,
I have attached kalkan from polish army museum in Warsaw. It's marked as battle shield (less decorated then parade one) http://www.muzeumwp.pl/emwpaedia/kalkan-bojowy.php I think we have more parade kalkans as they were expensive and not used in fight. When I say parade, it should have precious stones / umbo made with gold, ... http://www.muzeumwp.pl/emwpaedia/kal...y-pancerny.php Still all colorful versions with steel parts are made for 'normal use' |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|