3rd April 2006, 06:23 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
PARANG PANDIT
According to Stone A Seadyak sword
|
3rd April 2006, 08:04 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
Very nice Pandat Dajak!
I think Stone attributed a bit to much to Sea Dayaks. As you know he also thought that the Kampilan originally was a Sea Dayak weapon. Have you noticed that most of Stone's Indonesian sword and dagger pictures are copied directly from the Leiden catalogues (f.i. Fischer's on Sumatra)? Michael |
3rd April 2006, 09:45 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
Hi Michael this is true but don t forget that this one is from north west Sarawak those people lived very close to the Iban .
The Design on the scabbard is Iban no land dyak |
3rd April 2006, 10:22 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
Hi Dajak,
I must admit I haven't studied Iban design overall enough to analyse your scabbard motives. But I think I can find a similar scabbard pattern on one of my Pandat below. According to Shelford's classification both of our Pandat are Sidin Land Dayak (please correct me if I am mistaken on this?). Could it be that the Land Dayaks were either inspired by the Iban patterns or that they share resembling motives? This based on your argument that some of the Iban are neighbours to the Land Dayaks? Michael |
4th April 2006, 10:55 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
Hi Michael the problem with these things is that who did have first the pandit
the Ibans or the land dayaks . If You have the book basic Iban design you can find it in there the design that is on the scabbard The problem with these things is that the pandats mostly very old and difficult trace back off the origin off the sword but it is more likely that this type off pandat has the origin by the Ibans . They where the mostly headhunters off al the dayaks are from borneo , It was never used as an tool only for head hunting. If anyone have pics from people with pandats like them to see. By the way very nice pandat |
4th April 2006, 11:42 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
Hi Dajak,
Yes, I have that book as well as the new Iban Art book. I had a look in them both, as well as couple of other general Dayak design books, but the only Iban resembling pattern on your scabbard I could find was variations of the general leaf pattern. This is a pattern variation that also is found among several other tribes. I specifically looked for the "fish" symbol on your scabbard but couldn't find it anywhere as Iban. I also tried to find the diagonal checkered pattern in the Iban design books. Please give me some hints on where to look? I haven't seen any proof that the Pandat has been used by the Ibans after late 19th C. Do you agree? If Pandat originally was an Iban Parang, why did they then stop using it and why did the Land Dayaks take over it? And why did the old field researchers only attribute it to the Land Dayaks? But I guess that Stone got it from some old source that I missed? Do you know which? Michael |
5th April 2006, 12:20 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 520
|
Dominique Buttin attibuted them to the land dyaks on his site
http://old.blades.free.fr/ I beleive most of his information comes from ""Catalogue de la Collection d'Armes Anciennes, Européennes et Orientales" " by Chales Buttin |
5th April 2006, 06:11 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
Hi he did that after I send him the shelford publication and pics off the
pandat because that is the same as the one pictured overhere Micheal he might got some imformation from Ling Roth The natives off Sarawak and British Borneo 1869 I have an sword that was an bringback by an British officer in 1820 So english where very early there before shelford make the publication more than 100 years ago before he makes the publication |
5th April 2006, 08:50 AM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
Hi Ben,
I have read Ling Roth's book but I think it's very cryptic regarding his description of Dayak swords. Sometimes I suspect that he mixes up names of the swords (Nabur vs Niabor) and a lot seems to come from hearsay. So if Ling Roth is the main source I fully understand why Stone also had problems with classifying some weapons. Another example is his description of the Dukn. A van Zonneveld obviously chooses only to quote it in his excellent book, maybe because it's hard to figure out what it really is? My guess (!) is that it's the Iban Pedang that resembles the Batak Piso Podang. Enclosed is a page from Ling Roth on the Parang Pandit (I think?). If that's the page then he attributes it to the Hill tribes instead of the Sea Dayaks. I also have enclosed a nice illustration from the same book of a Pandat that resembles yours. Also note that Ling Roth attributes the Kampilan in the same illustration to the Lanun tribe. This thread more and more looks like a discussion only between us so unless somebody else would like to participate maybe we should continue it off forum? And I am sure that we all would like to see the 1820 bring back sword. Michael PS RhysMichael, Charles Buttin's Catalogue is a catalogue of his collection. I don't have it with me at the moment but I think there is only one plate in it of Indonesian weapons. I find the D Buttin site very well researched and you can find a separate reference list on the site with several good books and articles. |
5th April 2006, 08:42 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
I show you the sword when you visit me other wise I have nothing news for you to see.
|
28th April 2009, 08:47 AM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
Pandat 3
I am reviving this old thread to share two pandat I have acquired since then.
I also hope other forumites could share there variations so we could have a nice reference thread. The first one with unusually nice scabbard carvings. Michael PS I have cleaned the blade after I took the pictures... |
28th April 2009, 08:52 AM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
Pandat 4
The second one is a hybride between the long (Sidin) and short (Bennah) variation.
Also the pin on the grip is unusally long. Michael Last edited by VVV; 28th April 2009 at 09:03 AM. |
28th April 2009, 01:19 PM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,857
|
Both magnificent examples VVV. I am drooling.
What is the approximate age of each? |
28th April 2009, 01:51 PM | #14 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
Quote:
So by looking on patina and work details my guess is mid to late 19th C (in order). I have been told from a local source that the Pandat wasn't manufactured after the 1930's. Michael |
|
28th April 2009, 04:21 PM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Phils.
Posts: 1,042
|
Hi Michael and Dajak,
Thanks for the pics and the info! What would be the theory or speculation behind the bifurcated end of the sword? Am very much interested in knowing what the hypotheses are! Thanks in advance ... |
28th April 2009, 04:42 PM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,330
|
Hi Michael,
Great examples. I especially like the carvings on the scabbard of pandat 3. But why do you think the scabbard is made so long (according to the blade) and "kinked" at the end? Or do you think it was just a "fashion" thing at that time or characteristic by the carver, just like te protrusion the pandat scabbard you depicted earlier in this same thread could be? I think your advantage by having this larger scabbard is that you have more of those nice carvings.... Kind regards, Maurice |
28th April 2009, 04:50 PM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,761
|
Hello Michael,
great finds. Unfortunately I don't have a Pandat to show! sajen |
28th April 2009, 07:50 PM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
Unfortunately I don't have any answers to your questions and Dajak has left the forum.
It clearly is a no-thrusting-chopping-only-weapon so I don't think that there ever was a functional tip. I double-checked the scabbard length and measured it inside. It fits perfectly. So I assume it's a prestige thing? Like mine is longer than yours... Michael |
28th April 2009, 11:33 PM | #19 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,224
|
Hello Michael,
Nice examples. I like the theory by Maurice : PHP Code:
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ghlight=paiwan Best regards, Willem |
29th April 2009, 04:50 AM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,247
|
Hi Willem,
When you compare the baiwan and the dayak blades, I think you might be seeing echoes of a shared ancestral culture. The archeologists and linguisted showed that the ancestral Indonesian/Polynesian culture originated in Taiwan, spread south through Indonesia, then west along the coasts into Polynesia. These cultures share motifs of canoes, headhunting, and similar. One can see the canoe prow both in the scabbards and in the tips of some of the swords. I suspect it's supposed to be the silhouette of a war canoe in all of these blades, although I'm not sure exactly why. As for the bifurcated tip, I'd guess it's supposed to be something like a crocodile mouth, but I'm not sure. Still, the pandit's definitely one of the 10 weirdest blades on the planet, and I'd love to know what it's like to hit something with it. All that square-edged metal in the handle might be painful. F |
29th April 2009, 05:48 AM | #21 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Phils.
Posts: 1,042
|
Quote:
For a while, I thought we have here a possible lead on the origin of the similarly bifurcated blade tip of the kampilan. Thanks just the same for the response! |
|
29th April 2009, 05:55 AM | #22 | ||
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Phils.
Posts: 1,042
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
29th April 2009, 07:58 PM | #23 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,330
|
Quote:
I have a very large purse (like the mine is bigger as yours thing), but don't look into it. By the way it is made by onionleather. Every time when I look in it I have to cry... |
|
29th April 2009, 08:08 PM | #24 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
Very interesting
Gents, this is one thread I am finding very interesting.
Would this image I have presented fall into the same area of discussion or is it a totally different animal? Gav |
29th April 2009, 09:19 PM | #25 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
Gav,
Yours is neither a Pandat nor a Land Dayak weapon. However it's a gorgeous example of a Sadap of the neighbouring Melanau tribe. Please share more pictures of it, maybe in a separate thread. Michael |
30th April 2009, 12:32 AM | #26 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,254
|
Congrats, Michael, those are great examples!
Regards, Kai |
30th April 2009, 07:13 AM | #27 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
Hi Michael
Quote:
I'd love to share more of it for all to see but it is for sale and I believe it is a breach of forum protocols to openly discuss items for sale. I will be more than happy to engage in private correspondence about this wonderful piece and supply images to all interested parties. I knew it was quite unusual and what I consider very rare but I honestly thought it was just a gorgeous version of the Land Dayak weapon and I thought to offer it up as comparison. thanks Gav |
|
30th April 2009, 07:25 AM | #28 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
Hi Gav,
Maybe you can share more pictures after it has been sold? Michael |
30th April 2009, 07:36 AM | #29 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
Thank you Michael
Thank you Michael, I would be more than happy to do so. Perhaps you can PM me with all the information that you would like to see posted and I can compile it before it goes.
regards Gav |
9th May 2009, 03:48 PM | #30 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 400
|
Pandat and latok use
Quote:
Nice examples again ! I have a old book that where the writer ( 1865) describes the use of the parang latok, In my opinion close related to the pandat. At first he mentioned that the sword was a Malay influence and was already in disuse for warlike purpose course blades from europe where imported which where cheaper. Interesting is that he explaines the use ( parang latok) as beiing used at two different ways. The one for small jobs like chopping wood,where they hold the sword in the nick of the blade for a better grip. The other way is for an very effective blow where you use the blade in his full length and first slash the blade into the wound and then pull the entire length trough the wound which maybe explain why the handle is that simple. The sword has to be taken between the fingers when pulling trough the wound. I can also imagine that a head can be chopped off with one blow that way. Your pandat with the holes drilled in it can be very old I think and I see some similarity with designs of the malay Anak Wali ( see spirit of wood) so maybe closer to the source? ( just a guess) Arjan. Last edited by mandaukudi; 9th May 2009 at 04:09 PM. |
|
|
|