Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 22nd April 2024, 08:29 PM   #1
Ian
Vikingsword Staff
 
Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,043
Exclamation More X-rays of the hilt

Here are the views obtained with rotation of the long axis of the sword. They show that tang width at various points along the hilt shows slight narrowing with progressive rotation from horizontal (0º) to vertical (90º), but not enough to suggest that this is a flat tang. The flattening is somewhat accentuated by the sword coming off the table as it was rotated, because of the effect of the gangya. Allowing for some parallax by referencing the width of the tang to the width of the cylindrical hilt at the same point, indicated little difference in width of the tang in each projection. This suggests a round tang IMHO.

Images have been rotated for ease of viewing the changes associated with rotation of the sword.

0º rotation (horizontal)
Name:  Sword-1 0º.png
Views: 919
Size:  529.5 KB


30º rotation
Name:  Sword-4 30º.png
Views: 898
Size:  447.8 KB


60º rotation
Name:  Sword-2 60º.png
Views: 888
Size:  351.1 KB


90º rotation (vertical)
Name:  Sword-3 90º.png
Views: 909
Size:  238.7 KB

Last edited by Ian; 22nd April 2024 at 08:48 PM.
Ian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd April 2024, 09:05 AM   #2
Sajen
Member
 
Sajen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,569
Default

Hi Ian,

Great pictures! But I am not really sure if the tang is indeed round.

Regards,
Detlef
Sajen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd April 2024, 02:54 PM   #3
David
Keris forum moderator
 
David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,044
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sajen View Post
Hi Ian,

Great pictures! But I am not really sure if the tang is indeed round.

Regards,
Detlef
I agree. There really is only one way to be sure.
David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th April 2024, 01:28 PM   #4
Ian
Vikingsword Staff
 
Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,043
Default

David and Detlef,

Geometry tells us that the only cross-section that produces a uniform width when viewed from several angles is a circle (or a circular object with many small facets). I believe the pictures show that this is not a flat tang, nor a square tang.

I would like to put it through a computerized tomography (CT) scanner, but those are expensive pieces of equipment found only in hospitals and radiology clinics and are not readily accessible. A CT scan would definitively answer if the tang was round in cross-section.
Ian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th April 2024, 11:51 PM   #5
kai
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,223
Post

Thanks for posting the digital X-ray pics, Ian!

Quote:
I believe the pictures show that this is not a flat tang, nor a square tang.
Actually, I'm inclined to believe that this tang is close to square (with some tapering along its length) since the tilted pics (30°/60°) appear to show a slightly thicker tang than in orthogonal orientation (0°/90°).

Regards,
Kai
kai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2024, 01:15 PM   #6
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,736
Default

If I were a gambling man --- which I'm not --- I think I might back the rectangular horse.
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2024, 11:48 PM   #7
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,736
Default

Here is another one in as found condition.

I've had it about 60 years, never felt the urge to restore.

The lines on the gandar are lengths of steel wire, exist on both sides.


Overall length 23.75" blade length 18.12"
Attached Images
   
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th April 2024, 05:45 AM   #8
Ian
Vikingsword Staff
 
Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kai View Post
Thanks for posting the digital X-ray pics, Ian!


Actually, I'm inclined to believe that this tang is close to square (with some tapering along its length) since the tilted pics (30°/60°) appear to show a slightly thicker tang than in orthogonal orientation (0°/90°).

Regards,
Kai
Kai, the apparent diameters are a little misleading because of the different degrees to which I cropped the pictures (and thus the magnification is slightly different). Eyeballing the pictures shown is misleading because of this.

That is why it is necessary to reference the measured diameter of the tang to some other measurement (such as the width of the silver hilt at that point). When I standardize for the slight differences in magnification resulting from the differences in cropping, the diameters come out to within a fraction of a millimeter of each other. The only view which is slightly narrower than the others is the 90º one. Alan may be correct in thinking that the the tang is slightly flattened, but it is unlikely to be rectangular according to the measurements I made.

A CT scan would answer the question definitively.
Ian is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.