![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 191
|
![]()
I found these two swords.
Any thoughts about the origin? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,235
|
![]()
Both are Parangs from Malay Peninsula. Here a good old thread about them:
http://www.vikingsword.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/000598.html |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 191
|
![]()
Thanks Gustav,
The lower one is a look alike, but the upper one looks a bit different from the examples of D.A. Henkel, especially the hilt. Has anyone a similar sword? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: OKLAHOMA, USA
Posts: 3,138
|
![]()
THERE IS QUITE A BIT OF DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THESE TWO EXAMPLES AND THEY DO FIT INTO TWO CATEGORYS IF WE GO BY BLADE FORM. ONE HAS A TYPICAL FLAT BLADE GOING INTO A FLAT TANG AND SECURED AND REINFORCED BY A FERRULE. THE OTHER ONE HAS A BUILT IN BOLSTER MADE DURING FORGEING, ITS BLADE IS MORE ORNATE AND HAS A DESIGN WHICH MAY BE AN EYE OR PERHAPS AN ELEPHANTS FACE AND EAR WITH THE CURVED METAL SPUR REPRESENTING ITS TRUNK? ARE THE BLADES SHARP ON THESE TWO?
SOME OF D.A.HENKELS EXAMPLES HAVE THE FLAT TANG AND SEVERAL HAVE THE BUILT IN BOLSTER AND ALL HAVE THE CURVE IN THE BLADES WHICH IS NOT TOO PRACTICAL FOR A CHOPPING PARANG USE. SOME HAVE THE POINTED BLADE AND SOME WITH THE MORE BLUNT CHOPPING BLADE. A CLOSE UP OF THE ODD HANDLE ON THE ONE AND THE DESIGN ON THE BLADE OF THE OTHER WOULD HELP REVEAL A FEW MORE DETAILS. THE LARGE SIZE OF SOME MENTIONED BY D.A.HENKEL ALMOST PUTS SOME OF THEM INTO THE PANABAS RANGE BUT IF NOT SHARPENED THEY WOULD NOT SERVE THE SAME FUNCTION. INTERESTING ITEMS AND A GOOD FIND. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
Albert,
Based on the background on the picture the origin must be Willem vd Post ![]() Seriously, the lower one is from North Malaysia (Kelantan, Pattani), as Gustav mentioned. The upper one is unusual and more tricky. However, based on the hilt I would at first glance place it in Sumatra. Could you please add some more close up pictures of this klewang? Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 191
|
![]()
Michael, it's a small world!
![]() I added a few pictures of details. I'm curious if this gives new insights. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,235
|
![]()
Maybe I am wrong, yet the lower one don't look like an old item to me. The engrawings seem to be done mechanically, the workmanship of them and the "trunk" is, how to say, something "other" like on an old piece.
I am not aware of similar pieces be made after WWII till about 2000, yet perhaps I simply have missed the information. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
My guess is still Sumatra for the upper klewang. However, I have not seen any identical ones documented anywhere.
I also suspect, like the North Malay klewang, that it is not before WWII. Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 191
|
![]()
Thank you all for your comment.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|