9th January 2009, 04:45 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
Is it wootz (sham)?
|
9th January 2009, 05:21 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
My first guess was for wootz. Not the best quality pattern, but I think it is wootz... if judging by appearance. The chemanalysis would propably not confirm it:-)
Sham is by definition low contrast, and the contrast is high here, hence I'd not vote for sham. Last edited by ALEX; 9th January 2009 at 07:36 PM. |
9th January 2009, 05:50 PM | #3 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Paris (FR*) Cairo (EG)
Posts: 1,142
|
Quote:
à + Dom |
|
9th January 2009, 06:49 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,083
|
In the woostz spectrum, most patterns with a very elongated grain, like this one, I would typically refer to as sham. As Alex states, most sham tends to have low contrast but I have seen over the years some with bolder contrast but all always have the real elongated pattern.
|
9th January 2009, 11:43 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
OK, next step:
This is an old Russian dagger. Would it be Anosov/Chernov's bulat? |
|
|