Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 3rd April 2017, 03:42 PM   #1
Tim Simmons
Member
 
Tim Simmons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,806
Default Solomon Is type ulas.

Just as I am thinking of selling a large section of my collection it sems hard to truley stop. This really nice piece arrived today. Not 19th century but still an early version. There is a little damage caused by worm or insect emergence.
Attached Images
   
Tim Simmons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd April 2017, 05:44 PM   #2
Tim Simmons
Member
 
Tim Simmons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,806
Default

I could quite easily change my mind as to how recent these might appear to be. Grasses like hair can withstand time with very little change is kept safely. As these 19th century example from the Pitt-Rivers show.
http://web.prm.ox.ac.uk/england/engl...-trophies.html
Tim Simmons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th April 2017, 10:47 AM   #3
Tim Simmons
Member
 
Tim Simmons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,806
Default

18th century English straw hat in the Met.
Attached Images
 
Tim Simmons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th April 2017, 04:10 PM   #4
Battara
EAAF Staff
 
Battara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,219
Default

These still look like great examples. Are they perhaps ceremonial?
Battara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th April 2017, 05:02 PM   #5
Tim Simmons
Member
 
Tim Simmons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,806
Default

Yes they are from the early 20th century. I think they are pre 1940 at least possibly much earlier? . The new one has a good patina. I can make comparison with some large clubs that would be less questioned. As to ceremonial possibly but tfunctions very much like Fijian Ulas except better in my mind. The only one that perhaps would not function as a weapon as good as the rest in the smallest. However they are all heavy solid things that could easily split your scull break your facial bones and end your restistance.

Last edited by Tim Simmons; 4th April 2017 at 05:28 PM.
Tim Simmons is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.