Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 31st August 2007, 06:58 PM   #1
Tatyana Dianova
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 689
Default An Afghan/North Indian Pulouar

I’ve got this nice Pulouar from one of the Forum community members. It is quite interesting sword. It has long, thick and heavy Wootz blade, which is differentially hardened (please notice the dark area on the picture). The upper part of the blade with inscriptions (closer to the handle) is forged from the plain steel. The handle seems to be added later to the blade, because part of the inscriptions is hidden by the cross guard. I would like to hear the comments about age and origin of the sword, also help with the Arabic (Farsi?) inscriptions will be much appreciated.
Attached Images
      
Tatyana Dianova is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st August 2007, 08:08 PM   #2
Battara
EAAF Staff
 
Battara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,189
Default

Actually it looks like the whole blade is wootz - just needs a little polish and etching.

Very nice piece. I'll wait for the others.
Battara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st August 2007, 09:07 PM   #3
Tatyana Dianova
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 689
Default

Well, it was polished already with 600 and 1000 grid sanding paper, and I do not want to polish it more. Otherwise too much steel should be removed because of the shallow pitting. I have etched the blade several times at home (it was a very difficult piece), that's why I am 100% sure, that the steel near the handle is not Wootz, and that it is differentially hardened
Tatyana Dianova is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st September 2007, 05:07 AM   #4
ALEX
Member
 
ALEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
Default

I tend to agree with Battara. It is possible that the heat/fire was used while removing/replacing the hilt, resulting in wootz pattern loss or modification (especially if non-wootz area appears close to the hilt). Moreover, in welded blades the joining point would be closer to the center of the blade (is it correct?).
Also, are there any blades which are edge-hardened and welded at the same time? I've heard of one or another, but never of both.
Interesting and nice sword. Both blade and hilt look like of Indian origin to me.
Would be interesting to hear from subject matter experts like Rick, Ariel and others.

Last edited by ALEX; 1st September 2007 at 05:26 AM.
ALEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st September 2007, 04:30 PM   #5
tom hyle
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 1,254
Default

I've seen welds in the center and at the blade base. European blades often (not always by any means) have a weld in the tang.
tom hyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.