Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 5th July 2013, 08:21 AM   #1
Maurice
Member
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,352
Default Balinese/Lombok pedang

Yesterday I received my latest find!

It's a very interesting pedang, as you can see for yourself on the images....

It has great patina and a very attractive blade, full of Quran verses and other decorations, inlaid in silver at both sides and the spine.


If someone would dare trying to translate the text on the blade, I will upload some close ups...

Maurice
Attached Images
     

Last edited by Maurice; 5th July 2013 at 09:14 AM. Reason: bad english...
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2013, 09:04 AM   #2
kronckew
Member
 
kronckew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,186
Default

ooh! them fullers are gorgeous!
kronckew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2013, 10:24 AM   #3
kai
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,254
Thumbs up

Quote:
If someone would dare trying to translate the text on the blade, I will upload some close ups...
Come on, Maurice, post'em close-ups!

Left side of the blade is orientated correctly (sequence right to left, i.e. base of blade to tip).

The right side is upside down - just flip it over (after doing the left side pics) and again go from the base of the blade towards the tip...
kai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2013, 10:30 AM   #4
Maurice
Member
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kai
Come on, Maurice, post'em close-ups!
OK, I'm glad you can give me the translation than!
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2013, 10:33 AM   #5
Maurice
Member
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,352
Default Left side of the blade.

Left:
Attached Images
     
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2013, 10:34 AM   #6
Maurice
Member
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,352
Default Right side of the blade

Right:
Attached Images
     
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2013, 10:35 AM   #7
Maurice
Member
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,352
Default Backside of the blade

Spine:
Attached Images
   
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2013, 10:49 AM   #8
VVV
Member
 
VVV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
Default

Superb find!!!

Could you take a picture of the hilt from the side facing down (along the edge)?
It might be the rarer Garuda-variation, instead of the regular makara/flower bud.

Michael
VVV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2013, 10:50 AM   #9
kai
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,254
Default

Congrats, Maurice, nice score!

Got the blade "washed" recently? It looks very dark while the inlay is shiny; I'd give the silver on the hilt and scabbard a gentle polish, too.

These pedang come from all over the archipelago - mostly along the arc from Sumatra to Sumbawa with a bit of Banjar/etc. thrown in. Given the Islamic script, I guess we can exclude Bali as the origin of this piece.

Hopefully the inscription will give us some clues... From what I can glean from the pics, the inlay looks a bit crude though. And the inlay is very intact. I'd posit that the inlay got added later but you get a much better idea from handling it up and close - what can you read from the blade, workmanship, patina, etc.?

Regards,
Kai
kai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2013, 12:22 PM   #10
Maurice
Member
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VVV
Superb find!!!

Could you take a picture of the hilt from the side facing down (along the edge)?
It might be the rarer Garuda-variation, instead of the regular makara/flower bud.

Michael
I hope this image will do for now?
Just made it with my cellphone....

Maurice
Attached Images
 
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2013, 12:31 PM   #11
Maurice
Member
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kai
Congrats, Maurice, nice score!

Got the blade "washed" recently?It looks very dark while the inlay is shiny; I'd give the silver on the hilt and scabbard a gentle polish, too.

These pedang come from all over the archipelago - mostly along the arc from Sumatra to Sumbawa with a bit of Banjar/etc. thrown in. Given the Islamic script, I guess we can exclude Bali as the origin of this piece.

Hopefully the inscription will give us some clues... From what I can glean from the pics, the inlay looks a bit crude though. And the inlay is very intact. I'd posit that the inlay got added later but you get a much better idea from handling it up and close - what can you read from the blade, workmanship, patina, etc.?

Regards,
Kai
Kai, the blade had not been washed recently. You can see the lamination when having a close look to the blade. It also smells not "washed", and it's just the colour I've seen on old blades, which turn out black from dirt or whatsoever...
I recently cleaned a Javanese sword with brass inlay. You could hardly see the brass inlay before. But after giving it a good rub with some dishsoap, the brass inlay looks like new, but the blade is still very black. No matter how hard I rub, it will stay black!
If you mean this with "washed" I think that's what happened.

The inlay is far from crude, but probably you think so because of the close ups. I never have seen a better inlay on these kind of swords.
It looks like it was done with a finewriter, but it isn't. When looking at the images of the whole blade you can see how smooth it looks, and not crude as done recently.
The inlay like this, is done the way it was occurring on other 19th century blades.
Also when you look on the last image of #5, you can see a part which isn't rubbed as good as the other part of the blade.

Ofcourse I agree the inlay could be recenter as the sword, but it's very good craftmanship and also done a long, long time ago..

About the silver, I leave it as it is. Love the patina more as the shiny silverwork.. :0

Sometimes you've got to have it in hands. This one is such piece you can't show it on images. You have to see and feel it.
The blade is very smoothly forged, high quality. Also the inlay is very good work, and therefore it's all there and not (partly) gone allready (as seen on quality inlay of old blades). This in combination with an enormous patina on the handle (which I've not seen often on these pedangs, probably because people cleaning the silverwork and decide to clean the whole handle instead?), tells me I need to keep this one in my own collection, though it isn't Borneo and I'm not attracted to these kind of pedangs normally!

Maurice

Last edited by Maurice; 5th July 2013 at 12:42 PM.
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2013, 01:26 PM   #12
CharlesS
Member
 
CharlesS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,857
Default

Excellent craftsmanship on this sort of pedang, with a gorgeous blade. The dark looks more to be patina than 'a wash', though as Kai suggested, I have seen these washed to highlight the inlay.

If I were a betting man I would say the inlay was done within the last 50 years and far younger then the sword. The Arabic makes it somehow seem Sumatran to me, but of course it could have originated in so many places as these styles were supremely popular.

Congrats on a truly nice pick up!

Please see:

http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...umatran+swords
CharlesS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2013, 03:56 PM   #13
Maurice
Member
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesS
Excellent craftsmanship on this sort of pedang, with a gorgeous blade. The dark looks more to be patina than 'a wash', though as Kai suggested, I have seen these washed to highlight the inlay.

If I were a betting man I would say the inlay was done within the last 50 years and far younger then the sword. The Arabic makes it somehow seem Sumatran to me, but of course it could have originated in so many places as these styles were supremely popular.

Congrats on a truly nice pick up!

Please see:

http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...umatran+swords
Yes, but not in this case. This one hasn't been washed. It's definately patina.
Beneath the surface you can see a very nice pattern in the blade, but it's hard to get it on camera. And I decided to leave the piece as it is, without any cleaning whatsoever.

Why do you think it's 50 years ago done? (just curious).
I think it would be done much rougher if it was only 50 years ago.
But who knows, maybe we get an translation with a date or maybe it says "made in Taiwan" :-)
Till than I believe it's much more older, though not as old as the blade.

I'm allowed to post next image. It's from a sikin panjang. Look at the craftmanship. Definately 19th century, but it looks "rough" also. But this is because it's done as thin and delicately as the inlay in my pedang.
I would like to see the inlay craftmanship in other blades which should be 19th century or older, just to see the difference (but than I want examples with as delicately inlay as the pedang).

Ofcourse I knew your thread: Very nice pieces Charles: I specially like pedang 2 and 6.

Maurice
Attached Images
 
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2013, 04:32 PM   #14
VVV
Member
 
VVV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maurice
I hope this image will do for now?
Just made it with my cellphone....

Maurice
Nope, I meant lower (from the ferrule and up).

Michael

PS It's from Lombok, not Sumatra.
VVV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2013, 05:51 PM   #15
Maurice
Member
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VVV
Nope, I meant lower (from the ferrule and up).

Michael

PS It's from Lombok, not Sumatra.
Oh yes,....
Again with my celphone.

Thank you for noticing it's Lombok.

Maurice
Attached Images
 
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2013, 06:39 PM   #16
CharlesS
Member
 
CharlesS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,857
Default

VVV,

I am curious what about this piece assures its origin is from Lombok? Are there characteristics of it that make that a definite?
CharlesS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2013, 07:11 PM   #17
David
Keris forum moderator
 
David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,127
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesS
VVV,

I am curious what about this piece assures its origin is from Lombok? Are there characteristics of it that make that a definite?
I am also curious what the indicators are for the origin of this piece. How would a similar pedang from Sumatra differ? It's not that i doubt Michael, but certainly it is more helpful for future considerations if we can all come to an understanding of what these indicators actually are.
If indeed these inlays are Islamic text i would agree that Bali is unlikely while Lombok is still a possibility. Thought ethnically diverse it does seem that a small majority of the inhabitants are indeed Muslim.
In any case a very nice sword.
David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2013, 05:29 AM   #18
Battara
EAAF Staff
 
Battara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,226
Default

I am with Charles in thinking this may be from Sumatra due to the Arabic. Several times "Allah" is present, perhaps in some bismallah or in Qur'anic verse. It would be better that an Arabic reader try to render some type of translation. I don't think it is jawi (though I could be wrong).
Battara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2013, 07:29 AM   #19
Jonno
Member
 
Jonno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 51
Default

Nice item Maurice!

My opinion, Sumatra. For sure.
The inlay can be done ​​later, but seems to be old.
(Islamic text)

John
Jonno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2013, 08:17 AM   #20
VVV
Member
 
VVV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
Default

Most important, the original collection tag said Lombok on it. ;-)
Otherwise, the hilt is more square than the ones usually seen from Sumatra (but often seen on Lombok) and the blade has fullers. On Lombok the Sasak are Muslim.

If you look at the lower part of the hilt there is a beak and a bird face (Garuda). I suspect that this also is a Lombok-feature.
Maybe Maurice can bring it out better with new pictures?

Michael
VVV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2013, 08:44 AM   #21
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,897
Default

Do we know when it was originally collected in Lombok?
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2013, 09:14 AM   #22
Jonno
Member
 
Jonno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 51
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VVV
Most important, the original collection tag said Lombok on it. ;-)
Otherwise, the hilt is more square than the ones usually seen from Sumatra (but often seen on Lombok) and the blade has fullers. On Lombok the Sasak are Muslim.

If you look at the lower part of the hilt there is a beak and a bird face (Garuda). I suspect that this also is a Lombok-feature.
Maybe Maurice can bring it out better with new pictures?

Michael
I think you're right michael.
Perhaps the text-inlay done after the Dutch intervention in 1894.
Jonno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2013, 12:34 PM   #23
CharlesS
Member
 
CharlesS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,857
Default

I am not necessarily saying it's Sumatran, I just didn't understand why it had to be Lombok, and I must have missed anything about a tag.

Good observations.
CharlesS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2013, 12:51 PM   #24
Maurice
Member
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VVV
Most important, the original collection tag said Lombok on it. ;-)

If you look at the lower part of the hilt there is a beak and a bird face (Garuda). I suspect that this also is a Lombok-feature.
Maybe Maurice can bring it out better with new pictures?
Yes Michael, that's right! :-)

I will make some decent pictures within the next few days of the handle.

It has floral leaf motifs all over, but looking at the shape there's indeed some kind of mouth visible and it looks like I can see some kind of nose? (just like a macara, only instead of the upper jaw it's tog an elobarated lower jaw).
But maybe it's just my imagination and I see the wrong presentation in it.

Also I looks that there's a bit in the front missing. But if so very long time ago as it has the same patina. But it might be that it's all intact and it meant carved like this...

Maurice
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2013, 12:54 PM   #25
Maurice
Member
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonno
I think you're right michael.
Perhaps the text-inlay done after the Dutch intervention in 1894.
Hi John,

Thanks for your approval of depicting the inlay of the sikin panjang!
Let's hope we find somebody who can tell us more about the text....

Maurice
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2013, 12:55 PM   #26
Maurice
Member
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by A. G. Maisey
Do we know when it was originally collected in Lombok?
Unfortunately I don't know anything about it or it's provenance...
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2013, 12:57 PM   #27
Maurice
Member
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesS
I am not necessarily saying it's Sumatran, I just didn't understand why it had to be Lombok, and I must have missed anything about a tag.

Good observations.
Michael's remark about the tag was meant like a little joke.
There was a tag saying Lombok on it, but it was a recent one so I detached it.

Maurice
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2013, 02:41 PM   #28
Spunjer
Member
 
Spunjer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 1,730
Default

yowza!!! heck of pedang, bro! nice catch!!! would be interested at the translation on this pedang
Spunjer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2013, 02:46 PM   #29
Maurice
Member
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spunjer
yowza!!! heck of pedang, bro! nice catch!!! would be interested at the translation on this pedang
Thanks Ron,

Still waiting if here's somebody who would like to translate it for us...

Maurice
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2013, 07:00 PM   #30
CharlesS
Member
 
CharlesS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,857
Default

Maurice,

Just for clarity because forums and emails carry no connotation and can be easily misinterpreted...like I did not understand that MM was joking about the tag!...I have no problem with anything that has been said about the sword, but if there are specific characteristics that make this a "for sure" Lombok made piece, of course I want to learn about them. I think I see what VVV is getting at about a more "squared" appearance, but I think we would need more complete pics and perhaps side-by-side examples.
CharlesS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.