26th July 2015, 10:53 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,178
|
Takouba with dual crescent-P arks
for comment: tuareg?
just acquired this one via epray, will make the 1hr 50 min. journey up the m5 motorway to me shortly. no idea how old, looks like it's in decent shape. crescent-p marks both sides... looks vaguely famiiar tho. the marks look european. had a search here on the forum thru the takouba threads /o much to add. i'm also tired. will research more tomorrow. any info/comments appreciated. thanks in advance. 73cm. blade 87 cm. LOA riple fullers both sides |
27th July 2015, 10:26 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,693
|
A pretty standard takouba of the 20th century or even the 21st. Likely not older than the 1970s.
The P mark looks to be a re-purposed European stamp and the blade is made from available scrap steel. Could be Tuareg or equally another group from the Mali/Niger/Northern Nigeria area. These seem to have gained a pretty generic style by the late 20th century and not have as many regional clues. |
27th July 2015, 11:20 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,178
|
i suspected it was a locally made item with the cresent-p marks as a marketing device to simulate a solingen blade. went for a fairly low price. ws described as 'vintage', which i take to mean not made yesterday but not 100 yrs. old either. didn't want to prejudice comments, but it's why i didn't turn in a high bid, looked too new.
(to be more truthful i have installed a 'sniper' program i wanted to test to make sure it was working, so i spotted this & told it to snipe at a low price, expecting i'd lose if the previous bidder had a higher bid. he didn't so i won it anyway. ) |
27th July 2015, 03:18 PM | #4 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,693
|
Quote:
|
|
27th July 2015, 10:31 PM | #5 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,940
|
Quote:
Not bad for a test run!!! What's this 'vintage'???? Heck, Im 'vintage!!! and a lot older than this takouba Nice going though, and thanks for the interesting query and chance to see these traditions still very present even into our own times. |
|
27th July 2015, 11:30 PM | #6 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,178
|
Quote:
some poor tuareg must have traded this in for an ak-47. bullets are expensive & run out, a good sword will literally last you a lifetime. of course so will a bad sword. but that lifetime will be shorter. |
|
4th August 2015, 07:34 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,178
|
it arrived yesterday, currently going thru rust removal and stabilization. i was a bit surprised it was smaller & lighter than i expected. of course, i've never seen one in person before.
495 grams, 34.5 i. LOA, 28.75 in. blade, grip 3.5 in. between guard and pommel, leather covered cross guard 4.25 in. wide, blade is roughly 1.5 in. at the forte, and roughly 2mm or so thick & fsirly springy. fairly sharp edge. the grip is more like on a viking sword or on a tulwar, in combination with the thinner blade and it's squared off point, this seems to favour the draw cuts of the tulwar rather than a european fencing style or a heavy chopping style... Last edited by kronckew; 4th August 2015 at 09:26 PM. |
4th August 2015, 10:29 PM | #8 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,693
|
Quote:
On the fighting style, yes from what can be discerned from surviving photos of mock fights and ritual dance movements as well as the physical evidence of extant older blades and sharpening habits a tip oriented cut was preferred, at least among the Tuareg where we see the most surviving photographic and video material. There may well have been variations among the more heavy cavalry oriented states like Bornu and Hausaland. However as I mentioned above most swords where quite a bit 'meatier' than the modern examples. |
|
6th August 2015, 12:10 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,693
|
I thought it would be worthwhile just for those who may come across this thread in the future to show a few heavier bladed taks and also a comparison of pommels. :-)
This is not in any way to draw away from the subject sword of this thread, just to lend a little visual element to the descriptions I was giving before of some of the characteristics of newer/older swords of this type and the transition seen in the pommel form over time. |
|
|