Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 17th January 2016, 10:31 PM   #1
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default Sword for ID

A local friend collector would like to have this sword identified.
No doubt about its production place; the sword back has the Klingenthal engraving, dated 1813. But the model doesn't appear to belong in the French armies. Could it be a contract for another country ? Anyone here familiar with this pattern ?

.
Attached Images
  
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th January 2016, 03:09 AM   #2
Gavin Nugent
Member
 
Gavin Nugent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
Default It is French for France

Hi Fernando,

It is a French pattern for France.

Chistian Aries shows these swords in Volume one.
I have not translated the text but the specific subject heading is;

Sabre de la premiere compagnie des mousquetaires
premiere restauration troupe & officer.

Or in English

Sword of the first company of musketeers
first officer & restoration company.

This may also help.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musketeers_of_the_Guard

This is also a great help in understanding the swords;
http://www.lemondededartagnan.fr/SIT...res_chap08.htm

Gavin

Last edited by Gavin Nugent; 18th January 2016 at 03:21 AM.
Gavin Nugent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th January 2016, 02:06 PM   #3
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Thanks for your input, Gavin.
Perhaps then a translation of the second line would read:
For troopers and officers of the First Restoration.
Given that the first French restoration took place briefly 1814-1815, one would be taken to assume that, the blade being marked 1813, should already existed (Klingenthal stock ?)and was later mounted in a musketeers guard ...
Thanks again.
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th January 2016, 03:12 PM   #4
Gavin Nugent
Member
 
Gavin Nugent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fernando
Thanks for your input, Gavin.
Perhaps then a translation of the second line would read:
For troopers and officers of the First Restoration.
Given that the first French restoration took place briefly 1814-1815, one would be taken to assume that, the blade being marked 1813, should already existed (Klingenthal stock ?)and was later mounted in a musketeers guard ...
Thanks again.
Your spot on there Fernando.

I don't often see French swords under discussion here...let me know if you find more and I'll be happy to dig through the Aries series as it is largely unused with the weapons types I deal in.

Gavin
Gavin Nugent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th January 2016, 05:33 PM   #5
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,957
Default

Gav,
Outstanding identification and referencing!!!!!!
This is quite literally TEXTBOOK response
You're right, the French stuff doesn't often come up here and very, very few out there have the corpus of key data by Aries.
Thank you for sharing the details here for future references, that's what this place is all about.

Jim
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th January 2016, 08:14 PM   #6
ulfberth
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 403
Default

Hi Fernando,

in 2000 a troopers saber of the 1st compagnie mousquetaires du Roi was sold at auction for 45000 French franks without auction costs.
This is around 9000 Euro or aprox. 10.000 $ all costs included. This was an original I was there and could inspect the sword in my hands, the first compagnie held 255 men.
If you download the picture you can zoom in and see the detail and quality
In 2011 a good quality copy was sold at Hermann Historica for 1000 Euro without actions costs. lot 5231

http://www.hermann-historica.de/aukt...db=kat62_f.txt

kind regards

Ulfberth
Attached Images
   
ulfberth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th January 2016, 10:21 PM   #7
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,957
Default

Excellent perspective Ulfberth!!!
With these kinds of prices it is easy to imagine why there are a good number of interpretations of these rare French swords produced in recent times and important to examine them carefully as you describe.
It is really hard to do from photos.
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th January 2016, 03:42 PM   #8
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Thank you Ulfberth,
I have browsed the net since i knew what this sword is about and also found originals with fabulous prices. The thing is i don't know wHether the example i posted is a reproduction; the blade being from a later date is a bad start. Besides, it seems as the originals had a Weyersberg blade and not a Klingenthal one. Also i see that copies are being made for a rather low price. I will have to hold this item in hands to try and appreciate its intrinsic value.
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th January 2016, 04:02 PM   #9
ulfberth
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 403
Default

Hi Fernando,

If you zoom in to the picture of the guard you posted, look at the casting lines were the foliage is, rough structures and small holes are evidence from re-casting. More detailed pics would of course help to detect this more clearly.
Another difference are the Lilies , the are too wide on the base of the cross, on the saber of the Hutin collection the have a more narrow base, these are just a few small details that uncover hasty work fore economical reasons.

kind regards

Ulfberth
Attached Images
  
ulfberth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th January 2016, 05:06 PM   #10
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Thanks for the hints, ulfberth
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th January 2016, 05:27 PM   #11
ulfberth
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 403
Default

Your welcome Fernando,
The fake in HH was made with an original blade of a 1854 model cuirassiers sabre.

The blade of the one you posted should look like the blades in the left pics, just compare the beginning of the fullers.
Some poorly made Indian copies have blades in the that if you bend them, they stay bended , these blade have a different color and look more like aluminum.

kind regards
Ulfberth
Attached Images
   
ulfberth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2016, 12:43 AM   #12
Gavin Nugent
Member
 
Gavin Nugent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
Default

Thank you Ulfberth, subtleties I did not at first pick up when viewing Aries.

With thanks

Gavin
Gavin Nugent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2016, 09:15 AM   #13
ulfberth
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 403
Default

Hello Gavin,

Your welcome, I only learned the fine subtleties after making mistakes.
All the type of sabres of Maison du Roi are of extreme high and fine quality, the casting is sharp and withouth faults and the old manner of fire gilding is of the best quality and looks totaly different from electrolytic gilding. Here is another one from the first restauration period from the Garde Du Corps Du Roi, I think the difference of the details are speaking for themselves
80 % of the fakes have electrolytic gilding.
I believe that the sabre of the thread is for sale on , armae... It has the same abrupt starting fullers, the same collor of blade, and dito broad lelies at the base of the cross of course here the casting faults are largely covered with electrolytic gilding
http://www.armae.com/contemporain/sa...son_du_Roi.htm

kind regards

Ulfberth
Attached Images
 
ulfberth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2016, 05:51 PM   #14
Valjhun
Member
 
Valjhun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 692
Default

Caveat emptor!

The sword is a 100% repro without any doubt and it is not even a good one.

Always be suspicious of October 1813 dates. Used by the Discriminating General and some well known fakers. Currently not in catalogue this particular model, but I remember that was not so long ago.

It does not have the grip ferule - nearly every original french sword from that period have one!

Then again, there are too many turns in the grip - the fakes usually have about 15, original swords about 10 or 11.

And then again: details, details, details.

Take look at this thread, similar beast: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ght=cuirassier
Valjhun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2016, 06:12 PM   #15
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Alright Matej, fully noted, thanks.
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.