Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 2nd November 2012, 12:40 PM   #1
theswordcollector
Member
 
theswordcollector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Berlin
Posts: 48
Default German Executioner Sword Marks 16th century Solingen Maker Marks Blades

Hello dear friends and fellow collectors,

I recently aquired two rare swords for my collection late 16th century early 17th century 1590-1610. They are both made in Solingen . The short sword reads in Latin I am made in Solingen on both sides of the blade the other (executioner) has what looks like the mark of Johannes Wundes W with a cross and orb ? Could anyone please pin point or id these marks with as smith or dater if possible? 1.The short sword also has a circle with a tower stamp. Then executioner also has on the other side the numbers 1.8.8.8. like medieval numerology. I belive it traslates to Creator or Lord/ Christ. I would be grateful if anyone has any information. Thank you
Attached Images
      
theswordcollector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th November 2012, 12:10 AM   #2
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,940
Default

Glad to have you with us!
Most interesting markings, but would it be possible to see each sword in entirety? It helps to see markings in the context of the weapon they are found in, much the same as with translating inscriptions.

It is often important to better understand 'executioners' swords, which were typically bearing swords or swords of state in many cases, though of course there were indeed some which were used in the capacity implied. These were in fact most often from Germany. The 1.8.8.8. numbers were of course not indicative of date but often coded ciphers representing usually acrostics with key phrases, invocations or slogans. The more commonly seen 1441 and 1414 are examples of this.
The majuscule W and cross and orb seem curiously applied in unusual style.

I am trying to better see what the stamp at the forte on the short sword might be, it looks like a crowned figure head. It seems unusual to see ME FECIT SOLINGEN applied in that configuration and on both sides of the blade without a makers name. The quadrefoil crosses at the right with the closing 'anchor' type device are intriguing and like many of these variations of blade markings can be found in many configurations. Most of these are not confined to a single maker or workshop but seem generally adopted in a collective manner.
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th November 2012, 12:21 PM   #3
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by theswordcollector
... I recently aquired two rare swords for my collection late 16th century early 17th century 1590-1610...
Congratulations .
Will you be posting the entire image of both swords ? It would be most interesting .
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th November 2012, 12:38 AM   #4
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,940
Default

Actually as far as I know the Wundes group typically used variations of the kings head, but am unaware of this superimposed type W, and the cross and orb was widely used. In one instance the cross and orb are aligned with Peter Kull, and I think another instance cannot recall at the moment.
This style W was used by Wolf Paller (1552-83) but was topped with a P (Bezdek p.150).
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th November 2012, 05:45 AM   #5
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,940
Default

Note to my previous post, apparantly these superimposed W marks did seem to have variants and according to Cronau (1885) number 32 cross and orb mark is attributed to Wundes, the W incorporated into the mark. This is of course quite apart from these marks shown on the blade of #2 but suggests plausible variant.
The 1 8 8 8 numbers are likely gemetrics for acrostic or sometimes sacerdotal phrase or invocation.
Still would help to see the whole sword.
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th November 2012, 10:06 PM   #6
theswordcollector
Member
 
theswordcollector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Berlin
Posts: 48
Default thank you for all your replies

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim McDougall
Note to my previous post, apparantly these superimposed W marks did seem to have variants and according to Cronau (1885) number 32 cross and orb mark is attributed to Wundes, the W incorporated into the mark. This is of course quite apart from these marks shown on the blade of #2 but suggests plausible variant.
The 1 8 8 8 numbers are likely gemetrics for acrostic or sometimes sacerdotal phrase or invocation.
Still would help to see the whole sword.
Here are photos of the swords. I would like to thank you guys for taking the time to discuss these pieces . I was thinking Wundes also but there is no knights head I can see stamped on this blade? Their marks did vary as many black smiths worked under their masters through the sword making process. The same priciple with Japanese swords. The sword is very good quality for the period and forged well.
Attached Images
   
theswordcollector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th November 2012, 10:12 PM   #7
theswordcollector
Member
 
theswordcollector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Berlin
Posts: 48
Default one more photo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim McDougall
Note to my previous post, apparantly these superimposed W marks did seem to have variants and according to Cronau (1885) number 32 cross and orb mark is attributed to Wundes, the W incorporated into the mark. This is of course quite apart from these marks shown on the blade of #2 but suggests plausible variant.
The 1 8 8 8 numbers are likely gemetrics for acrostic or sometimes sacerdotal phrase or invocation.
Still would help to see the whole sword.
here they are :-)
Attached Images
  
theswordcollector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2012, 09:25 AM   #8
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Great piece you got there. I dream of having one
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2012, 11:08 PM   #9
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by theswordcollector
Here are photos of the swords. I would like to thank you guys for taking the time to discuss these pieces . I was thinking Wundes also but there is no knights head I can see stamped on this blade? Their marks did vary as many black smiths worked under their masters through the sword making process. The same priciple with Japanese swords. The sword is very good quality for the period and forged well.
Thank you very much for the full photos of these two outstanding examples!
As you note, there were apprentices and varying workmen in the shops which can easily account for variations in spelling in inscriptions as well as deviations in markings. Many markings and inscriptions were popularized within the industry and used rather collectively with apparant favorites with certain makers shops.
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.