![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 93
|
![]()
Hello everyone, this is a keris I've had for a long time but I've never seen a blade like it anywhere-has anyone any ideas on this dapor?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 74
|
![]()
Can it be a kind of keris putut?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]()
Taking a shot at it... Dapur Sepang Putut Kembar?...
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
![]()
Looks like a putut at both sides. probably heavy coroded due the etching.
Putut kembar is probably the dapur. Sepang???? Don't know.......... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 132
|
![]()
That the pictures turn out with more red pixels looking like corroded. But I seconded the idea that the blade has been wear-off due to age and etching probably. Looks like 2 pututs there. Hmm...
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 49
|
![]()
Hi lemmythesmith,
Dapur of u r keris: dapur regol (n thats not putut kembar)..... dapur regol : is straight keris with 2 "gandik" (front side and back side) and 2 "blumbangan/pijetan" ****pic. removed****** Last edited by cahaya; 27th July 2007 at 08:41 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,096
|
![]()
Cahaya, care to translate that description so that we can all understand why you think dapor regol is the correct answer?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 49
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() (pic of dapur regol can be found in Ensiklopedi Kers By Bambang Harsinuksmo p. 390) regards |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,096
|
![]()
Cahaya, i am not questioning your opinion and it may well be the correct one. Frankly i (and all other non-Indonesian speakers) would have no way of knowing based on your post. What i am asking you is to simply explain why what is written in Harsinuksmo has led you to this opinion. In other words, what does this passage that you have posted say?
![]() It is important to me that we all have an equal chance at understanding what is posted on this English speaking forum. If you can't tell us what it means, don't post it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]() Quote:
Looking at the gandik area... hmmm... a bit different, but I guess it's acceptable as Dapur Regol. ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: J a k a r t a
Posts: 991
|
![]() Quote:
Dhapur "regol" has two "gandhiks" (the front of the base of keris), with no "sekar kacang" (elephant's nose). You may differ with dhapur "sepang" that has two "wadidangs" (the rear of the base of keris). If there are two "puthuts" (like hindhu of budha priest relief), then you may call it as dhapur "regol puthut". (This is a logical name, based on the details of the keris) In "puthut kembar" (twin puthut), one priest relief placed in the gandhik, and the other in the wadidang. But in this keris, the twin puthut are on the twin gandhik. Thus, this is a "regol puthut", or "puthut regol"... Ganjawulung |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: J a k a r t a
Posts: 991
|
![]() Quote:
Thanks for you info, Cahaya... Ganjawulung |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|