Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 1st December 2014, 01:15 PM   #1
BANDOOK
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: AUCKLAND,NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 624
Default IDENTIFICATION REQUIRED,GUN FROM MIDDLE EAST MOSTLY BEDOUIN OR SAUDI ARABIA

AM POSTING PICTURES OF MY BEDOUIN MUSKET WAS TOLD IT COULD BE FROM SAUDI ARABIA OR OMAN,HAS BARNETT ,LONDON ON THE LOCKS,PLEASE LET ME KNOW YOUR VIEWS WHERE IT COMES FROM
REGARDS RAJESH
Attached Images
      
BANDOOK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2014, 05:40 PM   #2
trenchwarfare
Member
 
trenchwarfare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 385
Default

It appears to be an all English made gun, with locally added embellishments. I'm just learning these, so can't help with the region of origin. Styles seem to overlap from culture, to culture, so pinpointing an ethnic group is difficult. I like it.
trenchwarfare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2014, 07:17 PM   #3
TVV
Member
 
TVV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,625
Default

To me this looks like a Snider gun, which was modified in Yemen to fit local taste. Nice gun.

Teodor
TVV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2014, 07:37 PM   #4
spiral
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
Default

Thats not English made, the markings are clearly fake.

All though the detail picture quality is poor the font & execution of the markings are clearly later & incorrect.

spiral
spiral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2014, 07:53 PM   #5
trenchwarfare
Member
 
trenchwarfare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 385
Default

In the middle east, markings have nothing to do with mfg. Yes, the font of the maker name looks modern. That doesn't mean it's not an English made gun. I've seen several Royal Afghan mfg. rifles, that have been scrubbed, and English markings added. Done I guess, to appeal more to the GIs. I was going by the fact that the lock looks English, and the trigger guard is heavily made military, not the sheet metal guards you usually see on these type guns. And I could be wrong.
trenchwarfare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2014, 08:12 PM   #6
spiral
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by trenchwarfare
In the middle east, markings have nothing to do with mfg. Yes, the font of the maker name looks modern. That doesn't mean it's not an English made gun. I've seen several Royal Afghan mfg. rifles, that have been scrubbed, and English markings added. Done I guess, to appeal more to the GIs. I was going by the fact that the lock looks English, and the trigger guard is heavily made military, not the sheet metal guards you usually see on these type guns. And I could be wrong.
Thank you for sharing your viewpoint... Although your reference, Afghanistan is not in the middle east....

I would agree the trigger guard looks legitimate, every other angle in stock & lock is off. The bolt holding the hammer is also clearly not English, never mind London made.

The fact modern fakes from Afghanistan, with a few original parts mixed in, {Of origin unknown.} you regard as legitimate is strange.

I State origin unknown as I presume you know many of the Royal Afghan Army rifles were made in Kabul etc. as well? Not just the UK?
spiral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2014, 09:51 PM   #7
kahnjar1
Member
 
kahnjar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,741
Default

Origin of the gun COULD be English, but as has been mentioned above there have been many locks with fake markings. It is NOT a SNIDER gun as suggested by Teodor. These had side hinged breeches and were not muzzleloaders.
The decoration style (in parts) looks Yemeni, but in fact could have originated anywhere, and may not even be very old as "ageing" is/was very cleverly done to fool the unwary.
A nice piece just the same and I like it very much.
As a note of caution, please check that it is not still loaded......
Stu
kahnjar1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2014, 10:57 PM   #8
spiral
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kahnjar1
It is NOT a SNIDER gun as suggested by Teodor. These had side hinged breeches and were not muzzleloader
The design copies the 1853 Enfield....

The stock design angles are different from the English ones though.

spiral
spiral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2014, 11:04 PM   #9
TVV
Member
 
TVV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,625
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kahnjar1
Origin of the gun COULD be English, but as has been mentioned above there have been many locks with fake markings. It is NOT a SNIDER gun as suggested by Teodor. These had side hinged breeches and were not muzzleloaders.
Good point, I should have paid more attention. And I agree that it is very likely a local imitation of an English lock as well.

Teodor
TVV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2014, 07:12 AM   #10
Shakethetrees
Member
 
Shakethetrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 363
Default

I can't see enough of it from the images, but it looks like it could be an Enfield rifled musket that was trimmed and modified a bit, then decorated. I know Barnett was a contractor for Enfield muskets in the 19th century. They would have been familiar enough in India/Pakistan/Afghanistan so that decent, letter for letter copies of the lock AND gun could have been made there and later modified by locals.

I've seen a lot of Martini-Henry's that are certified copies made in South Asia as well. Some had impeccable marks that are hard to discern from those of the UK arsenals, others are roughly cut, misspelled and even written in gibberish that only resembles English.
Shakethetrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2014, 11:35 AM   #11
BANDOOK
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: AUCKLAND,NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 624
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakethetrees
I can't see enough of it from the images, but it looks like it could be an Enfield rifled musket that was trimmed and modified a bit, then decorated. I know Barnett was a contractor for Enfield muskets in the 19th century. They would have been familiar enough in India/Pakistan/Afghanistan so that decent, letter for letter copies of the lock AND gun could have been made there and later modified by locals.

I've seen a lot of Martini-Henry's that are certified copies made in South Asia as well. Some had impeccable marks that are hard to discern from those of the UK arsenals, others are roughly cut, misspelled and even written in gibberish that only resembles English.
thanks all for comments/inputs ,appreciated
BANDOOK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.