6th November 2011, 01:27 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 373
|
Odd Afghan find for ID
This cast steel dagger was found in rubble in Afghanistan. It is a somewhat crude casting, with a full size grip area 5 1/4 inch blade of Choora shape? overall 9 7/8s inch. The odd pommel shape reminds me of a Zafar type support, but, craftsmanship falls short.
How was it used? It rings nicely. Was cast steel ever used for weapons? I believe that cast steel was used for Straight Razors , sheep shearing blades, etc. Were for example, any of the one piece Chilanums, cast and then hand finished? Casting an ornate hilt would have practical in those daggers with a wootz blade attached. Any comments or ideas welcome, Steve |
6th November 2011, 02:37 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
The cast steel you refer to was cast during the smelting process into ingots that were then forged to make razors etc.
The razors ,shears etc. that say "cast steel" on them were not cast, they were forged. Spiral |
6th November 2011, 03:00 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Nashville
Posts: 314
|
This is very strange, do you know where in Afghanistan was this found? I have never heard of carst iron or steel weapons. It could be something new, probably strictly decorative.
|
6th November 2011, 09:05 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 373
|
Spiral, Thanks for the explanation of cast steels manufacturing steps.
AJ1356, The story was found by US Army forces, location unknown. Handling it I would have said made as a toy for a child. The odd part is the hilt size will easily accommodate an adults hand. Maybe it is a ritual item. I'm hoping someone has seen this odd form before that would go a long way to answering the puzzle. |
7th November 2011, 03:08 AM | #5 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,940
|
This dagger seems to me remarkably like Indian 'chilanum', which commonly of course have variations of transversely extended bar in place of pommel, and often temporally resemble anthromorphic style hilts of ancient times in degree.
The crossguard or quillon block also resembles these type daggers in some of the variations, with these kinds of weapons from N.India/Deccan, and with the bud terminals (Deccani style 17th c. 'Elgood' p.117, "Hindu Arms and Ritual"). Interestingly the pommel 'bar' with upturned stylized dragonheads resemble daggers using this form from Vijayanagara of examples captured at Adoni in 1689 and taken to the Bikaner armoury in Rajasthan. Much of the south of Afghanistan was controlled by Mughals in N.India while Safavids controlled the west, and these type dragonheads were both Safavid and Ottoman in favored motif. The dagger form itself is termed a 'khapwah' ("Art of the Muslim Knight", p.185) and this interesting variant reflects amalgamation of the Pashtun 'choora' blade and hilt elements of chilanum style featuring Deccani and N. Indian characteristics. It is always hard to judge actual age of a weapon from photos, but there does seem to be genuine aging in the metal commensurate with its stated discovery in rubble supposing having been in situ in the structure for some time. It would seem quite possible to have been an early to mid 18th c. item. I would point out that many weapons of India have been viewed misleadingly as unusually small in certain cases, and in Afghan regions the axes known as 'lohar' when actually handled seem unintimidating in size. Many of these kinds of weapons were small but quite deadly when used in close contact and against unsuspecting or indisposed victims, and were covertly hidden in clothing. There is no reason to suspect this is a ritual weapon, but representative of the confluence of forms and styles typical in these regions, and quite a fascinating variant. Thank you for sharing this! All best regards, Jim |
7th November 2011, 02:24 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
A marriage of a Choora blade with a Zafar Takieh-type handle. Obviously, not a very popular design, and we are unlikely to count it as the first example of a previously-unknown type :-)
Superficially, the casting technique would disqualify it from being a weapon: forging removes impurities, eliminates air bubbles etc, etc. However, human body is soft and squishy, and any hard metal object would do well against it. Humanity suffered a lot of casualties from cast bronze weapons. Who knows why and when this thing was made..... |
7th November 2011, 06:32 PM | #7 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,940
|
Continuing reviewing this dagger, I see the point of comparison Steve is making with the 'zafar takiya' but comprehensively the association is of course by the transversely extended bar seen on some types of these.
For clarification , the 'zafar' is actually a 'pillow sword' used typically by princes or royal figures, allegedly for support as they sit on thier pillow holding audience. The term itself means 'cushion of victory' as described by Pant, Egerton. While many of these 'zafar' are with a diagonally positioned pommel bar attached to a knuckleguard at the pommel or with a hinged bar attached to pommel cap, there are also forms which have the symmetrical upward curved bar at the pommel with downturned finials said to be a 'crutch' shape. This form of 'zafar' is associated with the variations of concealed blades in walking stick or most commonly termed the support known as the 'fakirs crutch'. The fakirs are of course Hindu religious mendicants who were prohibited to have weapons and used these blades in 'crutches' for protection. These were often also termed 'gupti' (Hindi=concealed weapon) and are found from central to northern India. The associated princely zafar, also often termed 'salapa' is of course a typically well made and suitably embellished weapon found from Tanjore far into the northern Mughal regions. Rethinking the chilanum association it is of course somewhat adequate in comparison and that these were often forged in single piece construction, but the transverse pommel bar configuration does correspond well with the 'crutch' type configuration. Obviously far from being of 'princely' quality there is a possibility of alluding to the 'fakirs crutch' rather than zafar, and in a weapon as mentioned, intended to be concealed. Clearly the choora type blade signals Northwest Frontier regions into Afghanistan, and it seems entirely feasible of course that the weapon may have been produced in northern regions of India. It is worthy of note that itinerant blacksmiths known as 'Lohar' might be considered in the wider scope of possible sources for this type of weapon. They are quite likely the source for the origins of the rather small axes called by this term used in Khyber regions by the Bannuchi (I think was the tribe). |
|
|