Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 16th September 2013, 02:29 PM   #1
sirupate
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: England
Posts: 373
Default WW2 Article of the 9th Gurkhas

Picked this up from Ebay the other day, a brief background to when and why the 9th Gurkhas came into being;
In April 1893 the 9th Regiment of Bengal Native Infantry became a Khas regiment (Chhetri, and Thakur being the stable of the regiment), and the Bengal Army converted all sixteen Hindustani Infantry Regiments into class units. The Khas class came about as a result of a query as to recruiting more Newars into the regiment, in reply Captain Eden Vansittart (of 5th GR) the current recruiting Officer replied with this argument; 'The valiant Army which had overrun Nepal, Kumaon, and Garwhal, attacked China and Tibet, and twice fought the British in the 1814 and 1816 War, was mainly made up of Khas Gurkhas (again a misuse of the word Gurkha), and as such this class of men were much more deserving of enlistment.' Captain Eden Vansittart is considered the 'Father' of the 9th Gurkhas. By General Order in 1891 all Goorkha titled Regiments were to have the name Goorkha changed to Gurkha (Ochterlony’s original spelling).


Havildars Kukri


The 9th having their issued kukri inspected by the Subedar
sirupate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2013, 03:26 PM   #2
sirupate
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: England
Posts: 373
Default

From a separate picture, a Naik with issued kukri
sirupate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th September 2013, 01:15 PM   #3
sirupate
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: England
Posts: 373
Default

The kukri on the top right

The description

A close up of the issued kukri on parade
sirupate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th September 2013, 03:05 PM   #4
kronckew
Member
 
kronckew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,181
Default

Aha!
definitive proof of the boomerang throwing theory. the 'sighting notch' to ensure pin-point accuracy for long range throwing. the wood grip of course being used to catch it on it's return after it's mission of severance.

they left off showing the opposite side which contains the parachute and landing gear in case the thrower misses his retrieval catch. one should of course not catch it by the blade, it upsets the gyroscope, and may cause tumbling...
kronckew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th September 2013, 10:34 PM   #5
fearn
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,247
Default

Don't forget, the notch also doubles as a screwdriver and bottle cap opener...

Sighting notch. I love it!

F
fearn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2013, 11:14 AM   #6
sirupate
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: England
Posts: 373
Default

Even the then War Office got confused on the making of the Mk4
“Jack Wilkinson Latham (MD at Wilkinson’s from 1935-1952) had a tussle with the War office (Now MOD) over a contract Wilkinson’s had for Kukri in 1951 marked WSC and 1951, of which 1,400 were manufactured. This was placed with Wilkinson’s as the War office was alarmed of what was perceived as to frequent replacement of Kukris.
It was noted that the inspection tolerance on the Notch (Kaura) were very, very tight. When this was queried with the Chief Inspector of Small Arms, Wilkinson Latham was told that the notch is a SIGHT and subject to the same inspection tolerances as a Rifle sight, Wilkinson Latham explained at length about the notch as being a traditional symbol and gave the CISA a short discourse on the history of the Kukri. At last, the CISA relented and the same manufacturing tolerances as the rest of the blade were applied.”
sirupate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2013, 04:10 PM   #7
kronckew
Member
 
kronckew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,181
Default

which of course brings to mind the other myth.

the other forces were always asking the gurkhas to show them their khukuris and wanting to handle them, so one bright nepali came up with the idea that telling them that they could not draw the blade unless it drank blood would put them off asking, which notion became gospel worldwide forever after.

i still hear that constantly when showing off mine. most people of course do not believe the truth and swear that all gurkhas have to cut themselves before sheathing the blade if they haven't killed something, and that i should too.

contrary to 'what everybody knows', the nepalis who use these in their daily lives are not foolish and do not cut themselves a few times every day when out cutting wood, etc...

they are also not going to throw a perfectly good weapon away unless they are really desperate and have no other choice, and are quite happy to hit the enemy from quite a few hundred meters away with a modern firearm, or artillery,rockets, close air support, etc. rather than a khukuri charge. tho they do always seem to get into situations where they use them to great effect. the ghurkha on the train recently comes to mind.

LINKY for those who are not familiar with his story

Last edited by kronckew; 18th September 2013 at 04:21 PM.
kronckew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2013, 06:14 PM   #8
sirupate
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: England
Posts: 373
Default

That is one of the better myths
It might have had its origins from when a Nepalese draws out his kukri in a revenge killing back in the good old days, then the kukri couldn't be returned with honour being satisfied.
sirupate is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.