31st July 2008, 06:48 PM | #1 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Aceh Sikin for coments
Using the search button i have learnt that this type of grip ( Hulu) is called Rumpung ( hope i'm right).
Entering RhysMichael's excelent work i figured out this sword style would be a Peudeueng Panjang. Somewhere i've read Panjang means large? What i didn't yet find out is whether this specific style, namely the grip, is typical of a determined subethnic group ( Aceh , Gayo, Alas, etc.), or is generical to all. However my main question goes for the way the grip fits to the bolster. Despite the quality of this piece being of a certain level, i don't find a reasonable explanation for the fact that the grip ( throat? ) diameter is clearly narrower than the bolster, not to mention the sort of crude gap at the junction. Also surprising is the lack of decoration "scales" on the horn material in that area. I first thaught that all this "irregularity" meant that some sort of decoration ring or crown has being there before and, for imaginable reasons, was later "harvested" from the handle. However i have lately seen quite a few pictures of these swords and i don't find that the ones of this type, those with inlay on the blade, have additional fittings on the grip. It could be that what i have here is a handle replacement, but i don't realy think this is the issue. Could it be, however that, these handles are typicaly (un) finished this way ? I know that some members in the Forum have great knowledge of these swords and have already handled several examples. Could i please have some input on this subject ? Obviously also general coments will be welcome. Much obliged. Fernando PS I have made a sketch on the handle extra picture, to support my poor english text . Last edited by fernando; 31st July 2008 at 07:06 PM. Reason: Paragraph addition |
31st July 2008, 07:21 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
If there was an crown or ring on it you see it on the hilt .
If you take an look at the swapforum an rentjong is sold missing part off the crown as you can see it is carved in the hilt and different color where the missing piece was . I never see an crown on an inlayed blade like this and like to see an picture of it if it exist . The litlle darker color below the hilt is from rust . Name off hilt hulu rumpung page 125 Ben ps don t you have zonnevelds Book (an must for the weapon collector) |
1st August 2008, 09:21 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,224
|
Dear Fernando,
I also get the impression that a piece of gold ? has been harvested once For comparrison 2 Sikins with gold inlay. The first I still have, the second I sold last year much too cheap. |
1st August 2008, 03:11 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,178
|
here is a photo of a number of sikin (and a rencong) with additional metal fittings, looks like yours may have a bit missing after all. i note some of the hulu on the source pages other sikin do taper a bit abruptly towards the bolster as if fitted badly.
The source link my modern plain one for comparison |
1st August 2008, 04:28 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,224
|
This picture is the old stock (or collection ) from Ben.
Therefore his claim that inlay and collar are/were not combined. |
1st August 2008, 07:35 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
You right Willem I like to see the ones that have the inlay like the first one
and have an golden crown like the rentjong . It looks like they not exist . Ben |
3rd August 2008, 11:46 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,254
|
Hello Fernando,
A smooth area near the base of the hilt (close to the blade) might be original in finished condition: At least the typical hilt of pedeueng pasangan does come with such a smooth area (it's grip is thicker though and the widening area between bolster and grip is usually smooth - thus, it may not be comparable). I don't recall a pedeueng panjang grip with such a smooth area - would need to screen my sources... Also, horn hilts in low humidity are prone to shrinking and you often see a gap between hilt and blade. However, in your example there is a kind of iron spacer between the bolster with inlay and the horn hilt. It looks pretty unfinished to me - at least, I wouldn't expect such a thing to be originally exposed to view in such a status weapon! OTOH, it looks like a perfect attachment for a crown IMVHO - I'd guess this may have looked like in the 2 left examples on the pic from Ben's collection (i. e. not being of the spiky version). To me, this also seems to be supported by the horn hilt having a much smaller diameter than the bolster -something I wouldn't expect to see in quality workmanship either! Actually, I have a rencong with inlaid bolster which once had a crown of the spiky variant: This is clearly shown by the marks visible at the base of the horn hilt (as Ben already mentioned). I'll try to post a pic soon. Regards, Kai |
4th August 2008, 11:03 AM | #8 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
Quote:
Ben |
|
4th August 2008, 01:53 PM | #9 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Thank you all for your input, Gentlemen.
In view of what has been said (and unsaid) and also due to lack of sustainable evidence, i think i better give this dilemma the benefit of the doubt. Indeed the grip/bolster junction, in this example, is not the ideal match, but it seems as this is not a valid self speaker, for what matters. Although the thickness gap between the two parts is somehow outstanding, this appears not to be an uncommon irregularity, judging by other examples one can see out there. Also i have yet not seen a sikim of this style (blade inlay) with grip (crown) ornaments. Attached is the picture of one of similar kind, that i found at Oriental Arms arquives, in comparison with my example. Fernando |
5th August 2008, 02:59 AM | #10 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,217
|
What is the difference in status or significance between the gold inlay type and the "crown" type of ferrule?
|
5th August 2008, 03:02 AM | #11 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,254
|
Hello Fernando,
Quote:
Regards, Kai |
|
5th August 2008, 03:15 AM | #12 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,254
|
Hello Jose,
Quote:
Obviously, the use of (low grade) gold will indicate a higher status than suassa (gold diluted even further). AFAIK, there are no indications that the use of gold (rather than suassa) was similarly frowned upon by Aceh people(s) as among the Moro. I'd guess that the spiky crown rather than the more rounded variant also shows higher status; the same may go for 3 crowns rather than 2. That's just a mere gut feeling though... Regards, Kai |
|
5th August 2008, 06:15 AM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
Interesting thoughts on this variation of Sikin.
Here is mine, also acquired from Oriental Arms. As you can see there is a bone ring as a spacer between the crown and the horn handle. http://www.oriental-arms.com/item.php?id=1067 Michael |
5th August 2008, 11:57 AM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,224
|
Things are not getting much clearer for me
The example of Arti'z archive really gives me the idea that inlay and crowns have been combined on that piece. As for the piece from Michael with the bone piece. This is to me feels like a later restauration. Ps. In the invincible Keris 2 there is mentioned that Suasa was higher appreciated than gold. Seems a bit unlikely to me. any ideas on that ? |
6th August 2008, 02:03 AM | #15 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,217
|
Pure gold (or gold mixture 10k or more) were frowned upon by the Prophet as being weak (making men weak). Swassa is 9k and below, about a 1/3 and less gold content and thus not considered gold as such.
|
7th August 2008, 12:36 AM | #16 | ||
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Quote:
Quote:
If i recall, what Ben asked was the importance of the crowns in handles, not the difference in status between blades with gold inlay and the the crowns. Crowns may be added at a later stage, while blade inlay is there from the beginning, right ? Fernando |
||
7th August 2008, 08:18 AM | #17 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,224
|
Quote:
I think that technically both can be done after a weapon is finished. |
|
7th August 2008, 01:43 PM | #18 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Quote:
I don't mean technically, but chronologically. Like, if you already have a noble status you will buy a sword with blade inlay; but if you achieve some status at a later stage, you add a crown to your sword handle. Just my fantasy Fernando |
|
7th August 2008, 02:04 PM | #19 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
Don't look like an fantasy to me Fernando
Ben |
7th August 2008, 05:04 PM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,224
|
Thinking that way, one could also get a plain Sikin and have it inlaid after getting higher status.
And maybe later add some status by adding a crown ? But I assume most status was already received by birth. Maybe Ben can confirm this. Ps. Ben, you brought your Lap top on holidays ??? Best regards, Willem |
8th August 2008, 04:00 AM | #21 | ||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,254
|
Hello Fernando,
Quote:
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=1995 Quote:
Regards, Kai |
||
8th August 2008, 05:36 AM | #22 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
Hi Willem internet cafe everywhere here in Sanur Bali
An High rank officer is not only by birth you can get there by good things you do like killing as much Dutch soldiers Inlay is most from the start you can see the difference if it is put later on Ben |
8th August 2008, 08:19 AM | #23 | ||
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,224
|
Hi Ben,
Quote:
PS. also getting back on Battara's comment : Quote:
But Sikin's with crowns are often very elaborate. With 2 or layers of crowns and enamel inlay. While Sikin's with Suasa are often just showing a simple ring of suasa with some very simple lines. combined with a brass ferule. in crwon shape. I am afraid even the noblest of the noble are attracted by gold. |
||
8th August 2008, 02:47 PM | #24 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
Hi Willem you right about the gold
Gold always more than suwasa And yes I did get sunbrand on my head Ben |
9th August 2008, 04:44 AM | #25 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,217
|
Well.....I never said that gold was not used. Even Moro stuff occasionally has gold on it, as in 10k or above. I have a Moro kris with this on it. It was an answer for the tendency away from gold for some.
|
16th August 2008, 12:36 AM | #26 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
I have just got the Zonneveld book.
He is very definite at mentioning sikins with blades that have gold-wire incrustations which, in this case, are called sikin panjang meutatah. So this variant his well established in sikin typology. Further he quotes that the part of the blade where (or when ?) these inlays are done is called sampa. ... i am learning Fernando |
16th August 2008, 12:46 PM | #27 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
Hi Fernando
I did mentioned before in this forum if you are interested in getting stuff get some books and good information Books are sometimes very important . Nice that you found out off the sikim inlay the name I can't remember that anyone has say it on the forum . Ben |
14th September 2008, 01:39 AM | #28 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,254
|
Here's my rencong with gold inlay, once present crown (triple spikes representing a bamboo shoot), and also the whole hilt tip once covered with gold (as shown by a piece of gold still attached to the damar).
Seems to me that this combination of gold decorations is a genuine Aceh variation. I, for one, like it... This rencong has seen hard times; I'll post pics when its state of preservation allows to show more details. Regards, Kai |
14th September 2008, 04:46 AM | #29 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,217
|
Interesting piece to have both - shame it is missing the crown...
|
4th January 2009, 02:28 AM | #30 | |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,217
|
Quote:
I guess this leaves the crowns for court or status wear as discussed in another thread. |
|
|
|