10th May 2014, 11:58 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,232
|
2 nice Philippine Insurrection Swords
I was fortunate enough to win these two @ auction. The larger sword has a blade that measures 21" x 1 1/2"; it is single edged(except the last 6" of the backside of the spearpoint, which is razor sharp as well), and very sharp.It is not a machete blade;it has a spine thickness at the base of approx. 3/16".
The smaller sword has a blade length of 20";the last 6 " of the backside of the spearpoint has a sharp edge.One side is flat and the other side has a raised medial edge. Both would be very effective weapons ! Last edited by drac2k; 11th May 2014 at 12:44 AM. |
11th May 2014, 12:12 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,791
|
Two very interesting Luzon swords! Good to have them in such an good state and with intact leather scabbards. Very good addition to your collection!
Regards, Detlef |
11th May 2014, 03:30 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,232
|
Thanks;did you determine they were Luzon swords by the blade configurations, the handles or the scabbards ? They almost look like naval cutlasses, but I don't think that they had much (or any navy), during the Philippine insurrections ;am I wrong in this assumption ?
|
11th May 2014, 04:05 PM | #4 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,791
|
Quote:
I don't think that they have had navy during the Philippine insurrection but frankly said I just don't know. I am sure that others will confirm that they are from Luzon, special Robert have a great and good collection of this type of swords. Regards, Detlef |
|
11th May 2014, 07:50 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,232
|
Thanks
|
12th May 2014, 06:42 AM | #6 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
Hello Drac2k, I totally agree with Detlef's assessment of your swords and would also like to add my congratulations on your being able to acquire them for your collection. As for whether or not these are naval cuttlesses I cannot say, but General Emilio Aguinaldo, leader of the revolution, organized the Philippine Navy on June 23, 1898.
Best, Robert |
12th May 2014, 10:00 AM | #7 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,791
|
Quote:
Regards, Detlef |
|
12th May 2014, 03:50 PM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,232
|
Yes, also thanks for the information ;I'll start to research General Aquinaldo's formation of a Philippine Navy. Preliminary research for myself has shown that Naval operations were a important part of American tactics in regards to taking forts, conveying troops,destroying batteries as well as supplying food, ammunition, etc.I am also sure that they could blockade supplies to the rebels as well as regulate or restrict river commerce. I would think, that were the Philippine Navy to be effective in engaging the Americans, it would have to be in the shallow rivers, with the assistance of shore batteries.
|
12th May 2014, 05:29 PM | #9 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
Drac2K,
If you PM me your email address I can send you a PDF with some information that might interest you. Best, Robert |
12th May 2014, 06:25 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 385
|
Years ago, I bought a sword off ebay, very similar in design to the "D" guarded one. The handle was plain, and hexagonal in cross section. The guard was much thicker. Sold it on ebay, to a gentleman who said it was a Philippine navy cutlass, from the Spanish colonial period. Yours appears to be a loose copy of such. Nice swords.
|
12th May 2014, 10:46 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,232
|
Interesting.Thanks
|
|
|