Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 6th October 2015, 11:05 PM   #1
harrywagner
Member
 
harrywagner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 373
Default How old is this Kaskara?

This Kaskara has what appear to be the makers mark (two crescent moons with faces) on both sides of the blade about midway down. This looks old to me. Maybe late 19th? I'm not the best at aging items so any help is much appreciated. Thanks!

Harry
Attached Images
   
harrywagner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2015, 07:54 AM   #2
Kubur
Member
 
Kubur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
Default

Hi Harry,
I have one like that from the 1970ties.
But yours shows three groves and copies of the half moon and it's a good sign because they tried to imitate old ones. So i think that yours is from the 1950ties. We have an expert on this forum called Steven. He will tell you more.
Best,
Kubur
Kubur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2015, 12:56 PM   #3
harrywagner
Member
 
harrywagner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 373
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kubur
Hi Harry,
I have one like that from the 1970ties.
But yours shows three groves and copies of the half moon and it's a good sign because they tried to imitate old ones. So i think that yours is from the 1950ties. We have an expert on this forum called Steven. He will tell you more.
Best,
Kubur
Thanks Kubur.
harrywagner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2015, 02:42 PM   #4
harrywagner
Member
 
harrywagner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 373
Default A fake or just used and abused?

Hi Kubur,
This sword seems much older to me than mid 20th. I'm not disputing your estimate, just saying it seems older. I am terrible at aging items, but I will say that if this does date to mid 20th then it is likely a deliberate fake. I don't see how this much wear and tear happened naturally in so short a period of time, even given the harsh North African climate. And if it is a fake then it will be my second one in the last couple of years. It strikes me as odd since it was not a big ticket item. It is almost the equivalent of counterfeiting a $1 bill.

Many thanks for your help!

Harry
harrywagner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2015, 05:46 PM   #5
TVV
Member
 
TVV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,619
Default

Harry,

I agree with Kubur here, these swords have been produced well into the last century. Edster has some first hand knowledge on the subject, and here is a great article by him:

http://www.vikingsword.com/ethsword/hunley/kassala.pdf

Sincerely,
Teodor
TVV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2015, 08:12 PM   #6
harrywagner
Member
 
harrywagner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 373
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TVV
Harry,

I agree with Kubur here, these swords have been produced well into the last century. Edster has some first hand knowledge on the subject, and here is a great article by him:

http://www.vikingsword.com/ethsword/hunley/kassala.pdf

Sincerely,
Teodor
Thanks Teodorf. That looks like a great read. I really thought this sword looked older. I made a similar mistake with another sword earlier this year. Hopefully this paper will give me clues as to what to look for next time. Thanks again!

Harry
harrywagner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2015, 08:35 PM   #7
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,940
Default

As has been well noted, this appears to be an example of a 'kaskara' from the mid 20th century. I think the person Kubur mentions is Stephen Wood, who has posted interesting examples of these for discussion, but does not seem to have been around for some time. I avoid using the term 'expert' but I think others posting here shared some remarkable knowledge gained from their research . Ed is one with the brilliant paper he did (posted by Teodor) and another is Iain, whose research on North African swords holds many of the key advances in understanding of these in the past two decades.

Here I would point out how important it is to be more aware of the geopolitical circumstances in regions using these swords to better gain insight into probable period of use.

These mid 20th century examples are often termed 'Kasallawi' as that region in far eastern Sudan was where the industry of manufacturing kaskara was essentially 'retooled' just prior to WWII. From the time post Omdurman and just prior to WWI, sword making had all but ceased in Sudan. Obviously after the British occupation during the Condominium it would be unlikely that arms manufacture would prevail openly as insurgencies were potentially always nominally present.

By the 1960s it seems that Kasalla was producing kaskara which were mostly in the form of the Darfur type examples seen in the time of Ali Dinar (d.1916, and as described in Reed, JAAS, 1985). This example does not have the typically seen 'X' on the crossguard, though the quillons seem compellingly wide. The lozenge pattern in the grip, usually embossed silver is characteristic as is the thick disc pommel, the tufted tassle, and overall appearance seem characteristic to those provided for Hadendoa warriors still using these mostly ceremonially.
The triple fullers at center blade are of the well known form typically known to the west in Saharan regions as 'masri' (loosely from the east, i.e Egypt) and well established in the usually shorter blades of the Tuareg. Also the twin moons (termed dukari) characteristic of the Tuareg blades, here are quite degenerated, indicative of later duplication by Kasalla makers.
These ordinarily Hausa produced blades clearly were carried eastward in their features reproduced by Kasalla well into the 20th century.

I always hesitate to use the term 'tourist' or 'fake' as in ethnographic weapons these traditional items are often proudly worn as status symbols and accoutrements of distinction by these people . While often they may be 'purchased' by tourists as souveniers, they are still often produced faithfully to traditional standards despite commercialism always finding other options.
Jim McDougall is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2015, 10:50 PM   #8
harrywagner
Member
 
harrywagner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 373
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim McDougall
I always hesitate to use the term 'tourist' or 'fake' as in ethnographic weapons these traditional items are often proudly worn as status symbols and accoutrements of distinction by these people . While often they may be 'purchased' by tourists as souveniers, they are still often produced faithfully to traditional standards despite commercialism always finding other options.
Thanks Jim. I call this one a fake only because I think it has been altered to look much older than it actually is. I don't see how 65 years of ceremonial use could do this. Well, maybe if part of your ceremony involved dragging it behind your car!

I share your appreciation of ethnographic weapons. I don't mind contemporary pieces. Age is not much of a consideration for me since the overall design of many of these weapons has not changed in eons. I consider that a luxury.

Harry
harrywagner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2015, 12:13 AM   #9
Rick
Vikingsword Staff
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,290
Default

I think that's honest wear and tear, Harry.
Let's figure it for 60 years old.
Rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2015, 12:20 AM   #10
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,940
Default

Thanks for the response Harry,
Well noted on contemporary items. While considerable wear is of course a factor in examining these weapons, their form and character of their elements must also be considered.

As always, it is impossible to fully qualify all possibilities of use and ownership of these weapons, and the mention of ceremonial use in the case of Hadendoa was of course incidental. I meant to imply that they were not necessarily intended for warfare.

These kaskara were also typically refurbished many times as they changed hands, so various alterations not surprising, and the quality of work may have been less than adequate in many cases. The conditions in which these might have been kept certainly could have bearing on their appearance.
Jim McDougall is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2015, 12:21 AM   #11
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick
I think that's honest wear and tear, Harry.
Let's figure it for 60 years old.

Kinda like us huh Rick!!??? plus a few years, and we're still pretty solid.
Jim McDougall is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2015, 01:06 AM   #12
harrywagner
Member
 
harrywagner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 373
Default

Thanks everyone for the help and info. As a new collector I appreciate it very much.

Jim - thank you especially. this is excellent, and valuable, info I would probably never have discovered myself.

Beat up as it is I still like it. It has many interesting features that keep drawing me back for another look. The little half-moons for example. I'll keep it for now. It will find life much easier now after what it's been thru. No pun intended.

Cheers!
Harry
harrywagner is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.