Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 6th April 2013, 12:37 PM   #1
weapons 27
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 462
Default chinese dao with two blades for comments

It is quite short it is 63cm long,the blade measures 40cm, 3 cm wide, the second blade 28cm long
Attached Images
            
weapons 27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th April 2013, 12:38 PM   #2
weapons 27
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 462
Default

the last one
Attached Images
 
weapons 27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th April 2013, 07:43 AM   #3
Timo Nieminen
Member
 
Timo Nieminen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
Default

I'd say modern. The style of fittings and grip, and blade are consistent with modern Chinese fakes, and I have never seen a genuine twin dao in this style. (I have seen 2 published examples in a book riddled with errors, obvious fakes listed as genuine, and major misidentifications, but given the overall quality of the source, I'm not willing to consider those "genuine".) In addition, I've seen plenty of fakes of this type on ebay. Unless there is a very good reason to think this is genuine, I'd call it a modern fantasy sword or a fake antique, depending on how the seller represented it.

There are historical example of twin dao, but they're mirror-image twins in the one scabbard.
Timo Nieminen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th April 2013, 11:20 AM   #4
weapons 27
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 462
Default

I do not think that it is modern
the galuchat on the scabbard is quite worn, sign of anciennetee, as well as the Interior of the worn sleeve, the patina that i was on the blade before cleaning...and quality of work, it is very thin and neat
weapons 27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th April 2013, 01:20 PM   #5
Gavin Nugent
Member
 
Gavin Nugent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
Default

This is not a sword of antiquity. I would suggest 1980s at best.

Disregarding the second hidden sword, the sword size and profile is found in antiquity.
The method of manufacture and materials in the sword shown is considered "New".

Gavin
Gavin Nugent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th April 2013, 01:45 PM   #6
weapons 27
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 462
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freebooter
This is not a sword of antiquity. I would suggest 1980s at best.

Disregarding the second hidden sword, the sword size and profile is found in antiquity.
The method of manufacture and materials in the sword shown is considered "New".

Gavin
ok thank gavin
weapons 27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th April 2013, 05:00 PM   #7
josh stout
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 407
Default

Yes, Gavin is correct. The work is all modern.

Interestingly, there are period examples of these double swords, but the majority are recent. I have seen two antique examples, and both appeared to be from the late 19th early 20th c. period. They are copies of regulation duan dao, but they have a bit of a novelty feel to them and may have appealed to foreigners.

Mine has what seems to be a recycled jian blade next to the longer, hefty, duan dao blade.

The copy posted is trying to match the style and period of the originals but the workmanship is a tell tale.
Josh
josh stout is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.