![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,855
|
![]()
This is one of the most unique Indian patissas I have seen. The blade is single edged and just slightly curved, being more noticable on the spine than the edge. The huge hilt is decorated in silver koftgari and the forte is decorated with a variety of Indian gods and goddesses in silver as well. The blade is good Indian crystaline damascus wootz with a lap weld where two practically identical wootz ingots were welded together; this likely was originally polished to be virtually invisible. The thin fuller is decorated with gold floral koftgari. There is an even thinner fuller above it, also decorated in gold koftgari, almost all of which is long gone. The scabbard is new.
Last edited by CharlesS; 3rd June 2010 at 09:17 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,200
|
![]()
What nice work. Quite unique.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 194
|
![]()
hi charles,
an very intresting and beautifull sword. i found an similar one at an older auction by hermann historica . it is the 57. auction from the 23 apr. 2009 lot nr 2952. there was also such an patissa sword offered. the fullers are there also decorated with koftgari work and i think at the pictures i see also an very light curvature in the fullers from these sword. best wishes send you stefan Hermann Historica Hermann Historica Last edited by dralin23; 6th June 2010 at 04:50 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,896
|
![]()
interesting piece..might be kirach..not pattisa..might be bidri work
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,855
|
![]()
Jim,
Why do you say "kirach" here? I don't see it, at least not one along traditional lines. Just curious. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,896
|
![]() Quote:
![]() In the nebulous world of sword nomenclature and terminology, especially in India, the 'pattisa' ranks in the top ten mysterious contenders. While Rawson completely overlooks the term, and puts all of these with 'khandas', Pant clarifies (?) by noting these are from South India and double edge, with the flared 'spatulate' tip. Typically these are in the Hindu baskethilt type mounts with the long seatings central on the blade nearly to mid point. The broadsword 'pattisa' is extremely flexible blade, and with the spatulate tip, is probably in some degree associated with the sword techniques favored by Mahrattas, slashing cuts. This is much the same as seen in Omani swordplay, with the kattara broadswords. Many of these are from Malabar, the western coastal Indian regions with considerable Arab colonization and trade. This example seems to be 19th century, and with the silverwork of the Bidri type (from Kerala regions originally but dispersed into Rajasthan, this may be Deccani). The blade tip on this single edged sword, in which the curve is ever so slight, has what may best be described as a 'classical' type point, reflecting varied much earlier swords that are single edged, some of them even with a diamond 'lozenge' type point (Ajanta). Some of the spear tip angular points are termed 'shilagra' in Sanskrit. The term 'kirach' is typically used for the straight blade tulwar, whose single edged blade is noted often as 'almost' straight. Thanks for the opportunity to discuss, nice sword!!! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,855
|
![]()
Jim,
I am defining the sword exclusivley by its "spatula" tip, but when you include the other identifying factors I do think there can be a "type" overlap. I generally think of a kirach as having a long straight(or almost straight) edge, with a down turned tip (like some Indonesian parang and klewang types), with the spine being unsharpened or at least having no more than a false edge. If ever a sword was a candidate for identification overlap, I think this one is. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,896
|
![]() Quote:
Good point Charles (no pun intended ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,287
|
![]()
Now you guys are making me wonder what that downward curved, fully sharpened long back edged basket hilted sword that I have with the thickened point is !?
I had to go back and look at the thread . That is some variation in form between the two. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,855
|
![]()
Let's have some pics, Rick!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]()
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ighlight=hindu
I was only looking at this when reviewing other matters two days ago. If it needs a new home Rick, it has one next to my Patissa. Nice interesting piece Charles, very eloborate detailing.. Gav |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,083
|
![]()
This is what I would refer to as a "classic" kirach. Two interesting features of the sword are what give it that classification. The first is that the cutting edge is on the opposite side of where you would think it traditionally sits. In other words, the spine is where the cutting edge is and the cutting edge is where the spine traditionally is located. The other thing is the tip is reversed to that the sharp edge is at the end of the spine and not a continuation of the cutting edge. As Charlie was saying, like a klewang. Since I had it out I couldn't resist taking a good shot of the wootz pattern in the blade!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,896
|
![]()
Rick, thank you so much for that clarification, and the great photos of this excellent example. I had not understood, relying on the vague references at hand, that the blade was quite contrary to regular sabre blades. In this case, backwards.
With illustrations of 'kirach' I had seen, without the kind of explanation you have offered, it simply appeared that the nominally straight blade was the criteria. With the blade in this configuration, this type of Indian sabre becomes one of the forward angle type in use. I'll adjust my notes ![]() All the best, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|