![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,855
|
![]()
I recently acquired the unique and interesting Dyak sword which seems to mimic a parang more than any specific Dyak sword style. The blade and hilt are clearly very old, with the hilt well carved and the blade showing some interesting chiseling, a unique crowit, and short false edge at the tip of the blade.
While the scabbard is nicely carved and made for this sword, it is clearly younger than the rest. Any ideas about terminology for this type. Have any of you seen something similar? Thanks for any input. Dimensions: Overall length: 28.75in. Blade length 20in. Widest point of the blade: 1.5in. Blade thickness at the forte: 5/16in. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 425
|
![]()
Jimpul?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,855
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Kaboejoetan Galoenggoeng Mélben
Posts: 458
|
![]()
Hullo Charles,
![]() Nice piece! I believe I may know the previous owner in Sarawak. Your piece looks identical to his, except his was missing the 3rd rotan binding (nearest the throat) and the middle binding was new. Also, his was uncleaned. He called his piece JIMPUL, early 20thC. So, it looks like it may be down to a name-game. Bottom line: It depends on faith, whether you follow the mainstream or a different school. To me, it would be a JUMPUL; but then, I have other 'similar name' blade types: viz. JAMBUL, JEMPUL, and JIMPUL. Best, |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|