Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 2nd September 2006, 02:55 AM   #1
ariel
Member
 
ariel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
Default Sword of Prophet Muhammad

I was perusing the book " Islamic swords and swordsmiths" by Unsal Yucel and suddenly saw something I did not notice before: among the Suyuf-i Mubareke (The Sacred Swords), the sword #2 (p. 17) attributed to Prophet Muhammad was described as straight. But the picture shows a clearly curved one.
I cannot attribute it to the printing irregularity, because the scabbard is also curved appropriately. If this is the case and, as we know, all early Arabian swords were straight (and, indeed, that's how they look in the book), the sword in question must have been a product of at least 13th century. Indeed, the sword of Husam al-Din Lajin (p. 80) from 1297-99 CE is described as the earliest known authentic, curved and grooved Islamic sword.

What is going on? How could the curators call that sword straight when it is obviosly curved? What are the implications re. its dating and attribution?
Attached Images
 
ariel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd September 2006, 11:22 AM   #2
S.Al-Anizi
Member
 
S.Al-Anizi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Arabia
Posts: 278
Default

I too, have found this sword interesting, its clearly not from from the 7th c, nor arab (absence of gold stamps)
S.Al-Anizi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd September 2006, 01:39 PM   #3
ariel
Member
 
ariel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
Default

I'll buy the absence of markings, the decorations (or absence thereof) and anything else .

However, I am truly flabbergasted how could the curators, the writers and the editors describe it as straight and miss its obvious curvature? What a shoddy job!
ariel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd September 2006, 04:08 PM   #4
Aqtai
Member
 
Aqtai's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Merseyside, UK
Posts: 222
Default

The status of the "Suyuf Al-mubarakah" as quasi holy relics has prevented detailed examination of them. While most of the swords are probably what they say they are, others undoubtedly seem to belong to a later era. We had a discussion about this before on the forum a while back.

http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=892
Aqtai is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.