Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11th January 2013, 08:23 PM   #1
Valjhun
Member
 
Valjhun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 692
Default KILIJ/SHAMSHIR/SAIF FOR COMMENT

Dear Friends,

I ve recived photos of this sword today, wich is offered to me for a swap. It looks oddly to my eye. A put toghether sword I would dare to say. The scabbard pieces/crossguard are 19th c. persian I think. The decoration seems silver koftgari, Syrian 19th century. I do not like the wire, looks like new, and the hilt wich seems an ugly copy of ottoman kilij hilts. It seems that it does not go under the wire and that the flower decoration? The blade however seems very nice to me. I made this observations based on photos I still havent hold the sword in person.

Is it a composite piece?

Any chance that the blade is actually wootz?

Any comment appreciated!
Attached Images
            
Valjhun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2013, 08:51 PM   #2
Battara
EAAF Staff
 
Battara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,219
Default

Composite - I will leave for the others. However I do see wootz.
Battara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2013, 09:03 PM   #3
A.alnakkas
Member
 
A.alnakkas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 1,340
Default

The fittings are Syrian. Seems to be the 60's work. They still make them like this and with wootz blades or recently made ones.

I like it :-)
A.alnakkas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th January 2013, 03:43 AM   #4
Battara
EAAF Staff
 
Battara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,219
Default

Although not my area, but the silver koftgari looks primitive and unprofessional to me.
Battara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th January 2013, 12:27 PM   #5
Valjhun
Member
 
Valjhun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 692
Default

Thank you gents! agree, the only part that is worth something is the blade. I will pass on that one....
Valjhun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th January 2013, 01:09 PM   #6
CharlesS
Member
 
CharlesS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,857
Default

Battara is right on the money I think.
CharlesS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th January 2013, 03:03 PM   #7
Valjhun
Member
 
Valjhun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 692
Default

Difficult to say, but I do not think that the blade is turkis, it looks more indian to me. Am I right?
Valjhun is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.