![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
![]()
One of the things I like about Moro kris is the incredible diversity of styles. Dramatically different pieces, extremely personal to whomever had them made, then later embellished the weapons as different owners made them more "personal."
BUT This has GOT to be one of the most unique, one-of-a-kind I have ever seen. The blade has been identified as a Dutch VOC Rotterdam. Sandwich welded in place. Very well made and solid. Age patina indicates it has been together for a long time. Overall length - 48 cm or 19" Blade width - 2.4 cm or 7/8" blade length - 35 cm or 13 3/4" Thickness of blade at handle - 1.4 cm or 1/2" Handle length - 11 cm or 4 3/8" Width at ganga - 7 cm or 2 1/2" Your opinion? Last edited by Bill Marsh; 9th May 2008 at 02:56 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
![]()
Ok, here is where it gets unusual!
Note size next to a more "common Moro kris" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
Congratulations Bill on a rare find!
That's a really strange combo of 3 different sword styles. Which of course makes it very interesting. Based on the sorsoran, handle and sheath I would guess Peninsular Malaysia? Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
![]()
Bill
That is an interesting kris. Seems like the base comes from a broken Sumatran panjang keris with this top part of the blade being that of a European blade? Lew |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 999
|
![]()
I saw this Kris last month. It's a beauty. The seller thought it was Moro. It looked Indo/Malaysian to me. Congrats on a good acquisition.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 132
|
![]()
Congratulation for having one very rare keris. Very strong peninsular Malaysia influence. As VVV mentioned, it has a close resemblance of Sumatran keris panjang/anak alang or bahari at the sosoran and greneng (base) and no kembang kacang. Could it suggest a 'kapit' blade ??? fusing 2 pieces of blade metal??? Very interesting.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
![]()
Thanks for the compliments!
I wonder about the hole through the blade? Just below the VOC. Could this be the hilt of the original blade where a rivet or some attachment pin came though? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
![]() Quote:
I'm afraid the hole may have been drilled into the blade for mounting and display purposes ![]() Still a very nice kris Congrats. Lew |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
![]()
Lew,
This is certainly a possibility and I have seen pieces with holes made for hanging the piece on a wall. However I am curious about the possibility of it being a rivet hole. I am not familiar with VOC blades, so I would like to pose a few questions for those people who have studied them. How far from the VOC marking is the hilt, usually? Is it near the hilt or further up the blade? In some swords, like kaskaras, the markings (crescents) are a distance from the handle. Most others have them near the handle. This is why I am suggesting that the blade and tang could a major part of the blade we see here. Why are there numbers and a difference in the blade showing a fuller-like depression below the hole? This could also indicate the numbered part with the "fuller-like depression is part of the original tang, enclosed by a handle, and is now part of the blade. No big deal either way. I am just curious. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,222
|
![]()
Congrats Bill !
These pictures are better than the ones you had before. Also nice to see the size next to a normal sized Moro keris. The makers of this keris picked only a very small piece of a VOC blade. VOC swords where not very big/heavy but certainly bigger that what remains within this hybrid keris. Normally VOC markings are not placed under the tang. So This hole is not a original hole for attaching the hilt. By the way, this reminds me of a thread by Antonio Cejunior, where he introduced a contemperary Moro / Tanto hybrid knife. Some forumites where pretty nasty on his creation. ![]() ![]() In this case the maker of this odd Sumatra / Moro / VOC mix is not amongst us. That must be the reason of absent criticism. not ? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 165
|
![]()
Nothing to add.
Just: COOL. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,089
|
![]()
Hey Bill, Thanks for showing us yet another fantastic and unusal blade. You really must have me over sometime for tea (which i will unobtrusively slip a very strong sleeping preparation into
![]() hmmm....did i just think that or did i actually say it out loud? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |||
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
![]() Quote:
I am not suggesting the VOC marking was underneath the hilt, but that it was adjacent to, but just above the hilt. In this case the hilt would have covered the hole while also covering the numbers. Quote:
Quote:
Well, you know he may be lurking somewhere, ready to spring from some darkened niche! Dressed as a Sumatran/Moro, yelling in Dutch! ![]() And thanks David. Two ferocious dogs and a lion guard this! ![]() I am suggesting that the blade started off as either a dagger, or the blade was broken off and a tip reground. OK I have tried to be more explicit. See picture below where I have (crudely) drawn a black hilt on this (leaving a space to show the location of the hole). Maybe, just maybe, it could have had a rivet???? ![]() ![]() ![]() Does anyone have any idea about what was the blade configuration before this was made? Last edited by Bill Marsh; 9th May 2008 at 09:06 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 327
|
![]()
Bill: Albert an I did see this blade at the Eugine Knife Show. Congratulations on a great find. This is the kind of thing that comes along sometimes once in a collecters liftime. I was going to buy it until i found out the price. I thought it was a little steep so i passed. Kinda sorry i did. Oh well........at least its still in the "family"............Dave.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
Hello Bill,
Congrats again - this is really a unique combo! While the VOC blade got recycelt, I'd guess that the bahari-like gonjo as well as the Malay keris sundang hilt were crafted for this piece. The numbers visible on your kris are the last 2 digits of the year - if you ever get access to a specialized lab, I'm fairly confident that the hidden century (1?46) can be revealed! Actually, the markings of VOC blades are not close to the hilt - the hole is certainly not original to the European blade; I also see no reason for a keris/kris to have this hole. I don't think this is much of a distraction - pieces of history tend to be not in mint condition... ![]() Here's a recent thread showing 2 badik with recycled VOC blades: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=6291 I'm attaching the relevant blade pics below: Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
2nd try...
(Pics courtesy of Alan and Dominique.) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
![]()
Thank you DaveS and Kai. Phillip Tom also saw it.
Dave, in the unlikely event I ever let it go, I will let you know first. Especially thanks to Kai for the explanation of the VOC markings on the blade. I really have no problem with the hole in the blade, just curiosity. If only these pieces could talk! What stories! Kai, what kind of specialized lab would find the missing digit? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,222
|
![]() Quote:
I like tribal art and tribal weapons because every object is different and indeed it makes one curious for the past of an object. In that aspect this is one of the most interesting pieces i have ever seen. Once more congrats ! Best regards, Willem |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,189
|
![]()
Yes this is a fascinating puppy - almost got it when I saw here in Louisville....
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
![]() Quote:
GOD! This piece has gotten around more than my ex-wife!! ![]() But thanks, all. It is an interesting piece. Should I go hang it on a nail? ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
![]() Quote:
Thanks, Willem, I have two Batak swords I'll be posting soon. I bet that you like at least ONE of them also! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
Hello Bill,
Quote:
![]() ![]() I'm not sure what would be the best approach to reveal the missing digit which is hidden below the forge weld. There are ways to examine wether a steel has hidden flaws and some of these should also work for this task. (I'm assuming that remnants of that digit are still present since the welding seems to be less than perfect which should make this fairly easy in the hands of an expert.) BTW, the most likely date is 1746. It also could be 1646 but that would be pretty early, indeed. (In the 18th century there were a lot more VOC blades in circulation than in the 17th c.) I also like those Batak blades - keep them coming! ![]() Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,189
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,089
|
![]() Quote:
My complaint about Antonio's creation is that it brought together two entirely different cultural forms for no apparent reason. There was no historical logic to it for me. And for the record i don't believe that i or any of the other forumites who didn't care for this arbitrary hybrid expressed that in a "nasty" way. We just didn't care for it while a good number of others did seem to like it. We are all free to express such opinions here i believe. That the creator of Bill's kris is long dead has no issue for me. It seems to me to be a true expression of a historical mixing of cultures created in an acceptable (for me) traditional manner to serve as an authentic ethnographic weapon. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
![]()
Bill
I have a keris in my collection that has weld in the center of the blade. There is a weld just to left of that blackened patch.The half to the left of the weld has no trace of pamor but to the right I can see a pattern. Will try and get a clearer pic to post. I remember a story about some of the Malay or Indonesian smiths that were forging keris and tombak from harder steel minus the pamor it made the steel tougher and was able to defeat the body armor that the Dutch were using at the time? Anyone here of this lore besides me? Btw when I draw this keris from it's scabbard it produces a lovely ringing tone like a tuning fork ![]() Lew Last edited by LOUIEBLADES; 11th May 2008 at 10:17 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,285
|
![]()
The more I look at this piece the more I see a very strange Sumatran keris masquerading as a Moro piece .
If we removed the handle and blade stirrup what would we have ? ![]() I'd love to know where this composite blade was forged . Bill, do we have a blade length ? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | ||||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
Hello Rick,
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Blade width - 2.4 cm or 7/8" blade length - 35 cm or 13 3/4" Thickness of blade at handle - 1.4 cm or 1/2" Handle length - 11 cm or 4 3/8" Width at ganga - 7 cm or 2 1/2" Regards, Kai |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,285
|
![]()
Hello Kai
![]() This really strikes me as the anak alang* type of blade seen in Sumatra . I'm not seeing much to suggest this is a peninsular blade . Maybe I should move this thread to the warung . ![]() Rick * |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | ||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
Hello Rick,
Quote:
BTW, nice blade, Rick! ![]() Quote:
![]() Regards, Kai |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
A difference between Rick's Sumatran blade and Bill's is the characteristic "C" close to the gandik.
Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|