New Jersey Ivory ban.... - Page 4

A. G. Maisey · 10th November 2014, 10:22 PM

Marketing 101:-

if we make something desirable, the price will increase

nothing is as desirable as that which is socially unacceptable, even though that desirability may be found in only a segment of a population

spiral · 10th November 2014, 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andrew

It was the Obama comment, Jonathan. Socio-economic comments are fine.

That's good then... It seemed relevant to me!

cheers!

spiral

spiral · 10th November 2014, 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A. G. Maisey

Marketing 101:-

if we make something desirable, the price will increase

nothing is as desirable as that which is socially unacceptable, even though that desirability may be found in only a segment of a population

Or just decreased in the UK unless clearly pre. 1947... Id guess clearly pre. 1947 as you say will become more valuable!

Who wants a collection of stuff that brings police through your front door? Only those who are fools or think {or actually may be.} above the law.

spiral

Sajen · 10th November 2014, 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A. G. Maisey

Marketing 101:-

if we make something desirable, the price will increase

nothing is as desirable as that which is socially unacceptable, even though that desirability may be found in only a segment of a population

Very good statement!

David · 11th November 2014, 03:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spiral

That's good then... It seemed relevant to me!

Interestingly enough, David Reinke, the hunter in question, is a major supporter of the Republican politics, so your reference to Obama wasn't really relevant at all. Let's keep politics off this site, thanks.

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/...-rhino-trophy/

spiral · 11th November 2014, 05:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David

Interestingly enough, David Reinke, the hunter in question, is a major supporter of the Republican politics, so your reference to Obama wasn't really relevant at all. Let's keep politics off this site, thanks.

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/...-rhino-trophy/

Your quite correct....My error.

Guess it was just his wealth , not his political affiliation..

But my "relevant" comment to Andrew was re. finances not Obama....

Perhaps you missed my post proceeding that one?

linky

spiral

spiral · 11th January 2015, 09:38 AM

California calling? Further ivory & Rhino horn laws proposed in the sunshine state.

It seems Californian legislature may be further tightening up their ivory laws, as they believe 90% percent of antiques for sale our modern fakes.

"The bill introduced Wednesday by Assembly Speaker Toni G. Atkins and Senator Ricardo Lara does away with that exemption and prohibits “purchasing, selling, offering for sale, possessing with intent to sell, or importing with intent to sell elephant ivory or rhinoceros horn, except as specified under very limited educational and scientific circumstances.”

"Antiques containing 5 percent ivory or less and antique musical instruments containing 20 percent ivory or less -- usually vintage pianos -- will also be exempt.

Personally As I've said before I see 1947 as a good cut of year myself & more or less provable if necessary.

10th November 2014, 10:22 PM	#91
A. G. Maisey Member Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 6,887	Marketing 101:- if we make something desirable, the price will increase nothing is as desirable as that which is socially unacceptable, even though that desirability may be found in only a segment of a population

11th January 2015, 09:38 AM	#97
spiral Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 1,712	California calling? Further ivory & Rhino horn laws proposed in the sunshine state. It seems Californian legislature may be further tightening up their ivory laws, as they believe 90% percent of antiques for sale our modern fakes. "The bill introduced Wednesday by Assembly Speaker Toni G. Atkins and Senator Ricardo Lara does away with that exemption and prohibits “purchasing, selling, offering for sale, possessing with intent to sell, or importing with intent to sell elephant ivory or rhinoceros horn, except as specified under very limited educational and scientific circumstances.” "Antiques containing 5 percent ivory or less and antique musical instruments containing 20 percent ivory or less -- usually vintage pianos -- will also be exempt. Personally As I've said before I see 1947 as a good cut of year myself & more or less provable if necessary.