Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 7th April 2008, 09:07 PM   #31
Mike Cudzich-Madry
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2
Default Where does it say that swords over 100 yrs old are exempt?

I have read all of your posts with interest, and while it may have been an originally proposed exclusion, where does it say that swords over 100 yrs old are exempt? It doesn't, in fact say this! One sword site was also using an earlier draft which specified "single edged curved swords"; this would have exempted European sabres because of up to one third of the back edge being sharpened from the point. Now, the only exemptions (apart from re-enactments, illustrations and sports) are for the very type of weapon (albeit for the real rather than the reproduction) that brought the bill into being in the first place; our own European historically cultural Military curved swords are not exempt!

This is a travesty; show me a hoodied yob, indigenous or otherwise, who is interested in the honour of leadership, obligation and duty represented by a sword. Show them a 1796 Officer's LC Sabre or a 1796/1803 Flank Company Officer's Sabre etc. etc., and all they see, with what little brainpower they have inherited from their restricted gene pool (nay, - make that gene puddle!), is that it can kill people, - anyone!

The problem today, is that thanks to the apologist 'do-gooder' mentality ascendant in our society with the eclipsing of the masculine by the feminine, it is no longer acceptable to judge people on their suitability as we used to; viz:- "no sorry you uneducated uncouth and pugnacious ignoramus, you are not a fitting member of society to possess something as noble as a sword" All that was necessary was to licence them and require the usual endorsement from a referee of professional rank; thus excluding the yobs and their yoblet offspring.

Mike
Mike Cudzich-Madry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th April 2008, 11:43 AM   #32
spiral
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
Default

As I said earlier Mike,

"Its an ammendment to the offensive weapons act, the antique exemption to this ammendment are already written in that act. " So you wont finf it shown in the new ammendment, its in the offensive weapons laws last updated in about 1988 I think.

Heres some more info from the UK knife collectors & traders association.

linky

Spiral
spiral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th July 2008, 11:25 AM   #33
kronckew
Member
 
kronckew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,187
Default

just heard there is to be an amendment to the silliest part of the law, in that countries other than japan who make swords by 'traditional methods' are also to be exempted. it also specifies that curved swords from any country made by any method prior to 1954 are to be exempted as well, so ww1 & 2 swords will again be OK to collect and deal in.

Law Linky

still written in the obscure ancient legalese dialect, but at least they are showing a bit of an 'oops, we screwed up' attitude.
kronckew is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.