![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,868
|
![]()
Thanks Glen, as I indicated, I did not suspect this was a decorator, or at least in later consideration. Photos are always difficult.
The dramatic point is unusual, but would be understandable if the blade is shortened as you say. These blade devices were probably added later, with unclear association. A 17th century Walloon with the 'Pappenheimer' pierced bilobate guard plates attached, may well have been the design sought in this one. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 237
|
![]()
Sent some pictures off to a dealer pal of mine.
Looks like a decorator to me. Blade and application of the markings seem odd. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 495
|
![]() Quote:
Respectfully who is the dealer? Cheers GC |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,868
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 | |
Lead Moderator European Armoury
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 495
|
![]()
Point taken guys but Ed's comment could have been conveyed privately as well. I was simply curious as to whom he refers. It is a pretty small world. I'm not here for the politics.
That opinion aside, here are some resized images. All fittings are ferrous and imo, steel or iron. The plates do appear cast but I believe I may have mentioned cast steel was coming into vogue by the mid 17th century. I do not think the plates were cast together with the body of the roped guard but joined hot. I have done my best to show sections that were assembled. I have scrubbed a section of the blade and will be taking off the grunge/varnish, whatever that top coat is. You can somewhat see it had been sharp and then somewhat bated at some point. If I return with after photos, that will reinforce my take on a shortened or re-purposed blade. I could guess it might have been from an older broken estoc or rapier but that is just speculation. As this venue is not an exclusive inquiry and presentation of this piece, I can hope that if I happen to cross post a name or few that some can understand it is, collectively, a pretty small world and we all should be able to discuss a given object. I'm done for now. Cheers GC Three more in the next post |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 495
|
![]()
That's it for now. Have a great day.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 | |
Lead Moderator European Armoury
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,868
|
![]()
I agree, it seems that common sense and courtesy would dictate certain matters and wording. While personally I have felt this sword is more likely an authentically intended weapon for actual wear and as much as with most weapons, possible use, my initial reaction was that it was a 'decorative' Victorian item.
An anonymous declaration by an unknown dealer without explanation for such assessment is less than helpful, and without detail, not salient to the discussion at hand. It is not politics, but simply trying to AVOID politics. Such comments typically lead to contention and unpleasant digression. That is why private messages are typically better for certain discourse. More helpful would have been to note an assessment by a dealer suggests this sword is probably a decorator based on 'such and such' and explain the details. As I said, my initial reaction was it was probably decorative Victorian, but seeing more detail, examination, discussion as better photos, I am inclined more toward Glen's views. It is amazing what sound discussion, supported observations and helpful evidence can give us in these kinds of exercises! PS,I really like this sword !! especially seeing your excellent detailed photos! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 | |
Lead Moderator European Armoury
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
... As if you were an actual moderator ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#41 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,868
|
![]() Quote:
Thanks Fernando, just expressing opinion, not direction. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 237
|
![]() Quote:
Bad form folks. My god, lighten up. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 495
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,868
|
![]()
Ed, very sorry, I think my perspective was in retrospect out of line. My objective was to have more information on what details brought the 'decorator' designation so as to better understand what to look for. Actually, the identity of the guy is irrelevant so I should have ignored that.
My regrets to you and Glen, it was not my intent to cause this. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 250
|
![]()
I remember I read some 12 years ago:
GOGAN, Art. Fighting Iron. A metals Handbook for Arms Collectors. Lincoln 1999, Andrew Mowbray. ISBN 0 917218 86 8. SMITH, Cyril Stanley. A History of Metallography: The Development of Ideas on the Structure of Metals before 1890. Cambridge/ London 1988, The MIT Press. ISBN 0 262 69120 5. And there was no cast steel used in weaponry before middle XVIIIth century. Cast iron was used in guns and cannonballs, but it was unreliable in this task until 1620s, and not used in swords. Too brittle. Are you sure the piece is cast and not just carved and welded? Now, my memory is worse by the day, so I could be remembering corrupted data. I got myself entangled in a Victorian cast iron rapier hilt not long ago... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 495
|
![]()
In receiving the piece and my following replies, I did see that some parts were certainly not cast. However if you look at the first set of photos regarding the plates, the face of it and openings sure do look cast to me and not cast iron (as we think of cast iron.
Bear with me as I have read differently and in regard to sword fittings. The following 17th century "chiseled" fittings, certainly beginning with castings. I will endeavor to dig up what I had read to confirm that. Cast steel for blade work, yes well noted and developed for cutlery in England. Then you have crucible steel (cast steel/wootz/bulat) going back many centuries. fwiw, those images in my files and reworked regarding exactly the same topic in 2008 re cast steel objects The supporting text escapes me at the moment Cheers GC Last edited by Hotspur; 23rd October 2019 at 05:26 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 495
|
![]()
Here is one but not what I was looking for
"The casting of iron artefacts also became common during the 16th century, but in the initial period after the introduction of the blast furnace in the late 15th century artefacts were mainly cast directly from the melting furnace. The first separate iron foundries probably appeared by the mid-17th century. " Keep in mind that modern cast iron goes way beyond the carbon footprint in blade steel. http://hist-met.org/images/pdf/HMSdatasheet304.pdf Huntsman, 1740 and Wilkinson patents entirely voluminous topics we could regard but look at the last photo (with the red background) showing the face of the plates. Much like those chased pommels shown in the last post, I see castings. Just my thoughts. Cheers GC Another https://www.engr.psu.edu/mtah/timeli...compare_et.pdf |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 7
|
![]()
Is the grip material different from that of the rest of the hilt?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 495
|
![]() Quote:
Cheers GC |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 495
|
![]()
While looking for something entirely different, I came across this old thread here that displays a lot of casting work.
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=18464 Cheers GC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|