Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 8th June 2021, 10:12 PM   #31
M ELEY
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,097
Default

I remember seeing and reading about other earlier swords that had their opposing guard (in the case of the 'kidney pattern' swords)bent downwards at an acute angle to prevent the annoyance of it banging up against one's leg. I did a search trying to find an example, but no luck. I think the ones I've seen were the early English hunting sword types. Perhaps this is why we see so many weapons missing one of their two shell guards?
M ELEY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th June 2021, 11:14 AM   #32
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by M ELEY View Post
... Perhaps this is why we see so many weapons missing one of their two shell guards? ...
It could also be a 'two in one' solution; the little central spring that holds the guard open/folded could break or lose tension. As the inner guard was a harassing part, the owner could just take it off instead of having the spring replaced.



.

Last edited by fernando; 9th June 2021 at 03:28 PM. Reason: spell
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.