|
4th February 2010, 02:04 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,857
|
Goooorgeeeeez Jose!!! Looking forward to seeing it. Now you can stop lamenting over the one I have that is practically a twin.
|
5th February 2010, 03:22 AM | #2 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,219
|
Kino, I took another look at it and may etch it again - there may be laminations in it after all.
Dimensions: the whole thing is 20 3/4 inches long and the blade is 12 3/4 inches long. Charles it is the same size as your great piece. |
5th February 2010, 04:37 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,769
|
Congrats Jose, beautiful Barong!
Detlef |
5th February 2010, 07:35 PM | #4 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,219
|
Thank you folks. Just re-polished and re-etched and still no lamination. I think there were some problems with the original heat treatment and this may have done something to the lamination. Just a thought.
Still it is indeed an early piece and I like the ivory, silver, and swassa. |
10th February 2010, 09:34 PM | #5 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,219
|
Another recent thought - on some very high end pieces the emphasis was on the hilt and not the blade, meaning a plain blade. My ivory kampilan has this feature and I have seen ivory and silver kris with plain or nearly plain blades. I believe Cato talks about this as well.
|
12th February 2010, 07:56 PM | #6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 478
|
Quote:
|
|
12th February 2010, 09:22 PM | #7 | |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,219
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|