Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 27th September 2006, 10:38 AM   #1
eftihis
Member
 
eftihis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chania Crete Greece
Posts: 506
Default It is definitely persian, the Zand period

Hallo all, i have just seen the photos i attach in the great new book of Manoucher "arms and armor from Iran".
In the photos are swords that exist on Iranian museums and belong to the Zand era, (arround 1750, before the Quajar).
The similarities are obvious, and allthough there is no exactly the same swords, its elements exist in the swords of the photos.
Therefore it is for sure Persian, made during the Zand era.
Attached Images
    
eftihis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2006, 12:58 PM   #2
Valjhun
Member
 
Valjhun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 692
Default

I still think it likely an early Qajar with a shashka blade.
Valjhun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2006, 02:00 PM   #3
S.Al-Anizi
Member
 
S.Al-Anizi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Arabia
Posts: 278
Default

The blade has no markings that can tell if its persian, but it has a mark, the star, which says its not. The hilt is certainly qajar.
S.Al-Anizi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2006, 03:11 PM   #4
mavi1970
Member
 
mavi1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: canada
Posts: 90
Default

Actually, karabela is also loosely translated in turkish also Ariel. kara for black and bela for pain/annoyance/giving or making trouble. So karabela is just not a loose translation in Italian. How it applies i dont know, just my 2 cents worth. but nice sword either way.
mavi1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2006, 04:20 PM   #5
Rivkin
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 655
Default

It is possible that both blade and hilt are kadjar. The star symbol actually appears in Azerbaijan, both Persian and independent; here one can see a quadara with Qajar coins, making persian attribution easy. Again one might speculate that the blade is from somewhere else, but I believe it is a local Iranian (Azerbaijani ?) production:
http://oriental-arms.com/photos.php?id=1170
Slightly more modern:
http://oriental-arms.com/photos.php?id=135
Rivkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2006, 04:58 PM   #6
S.Al-Anizi
Member
 
S.Al-Anizi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Arabia
Posts: 278
Default

Interesting find rivkin, this says that the blade could be Persian then.
S.Al-Anizi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2006, 07:52 PM   #7
ham
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 190
Default

Gentlemen,

The hilt of the sword is late Qajar, the blade is a Caucasian, probably Amuzgi made, copy of a Persian saber blade. This type is covered in Elgood Arabian Arms.
The name 'karabela' may or may not derive from Turkish. Both Elgood and Pinchot argue for the city of Karbala, see Elgood Arabian Arms, Pinchot Shamshirs.

Ham
ham is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.