|
27th April 2016, 02:33 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,204
|
I miss rivets that formerly helt the inside cap and I miss traces where the chin straps have been fixed and honestly I've never seen a iron hat of this style................
corrado26 |
28th April 2016, 12:12 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 214
|
This is helmet is of spangen construction wherin the bowl of the helmet is made up of from 2 to 6 plates riveted to a strapwork frame. Helmets have been made in this fashion from the iron age to the Renaissance. In this case the bowl is made from two halves from back to front. It appears that a strap running from side to side was used to provide initial stabilization for installing the strap from back to front to join the two halves along their seem. The bowl was the attached to its brim using a simple flange on the brim, I've made a few hundered helmets in this manner in my years swining a hammer. Kettle helmets constructed in this manner appear frequently in 13th and 14th century manuscript artwork. 13th century kettle helms typically have either a more domed, or truncated cone shape to the bowl portion. In the 14th century a bit more of a peaked bowl begins to appear ( by way of example see the illuminated Address from the town of Prato of Robert of Anjou, c. first half of the 14th c.). In the 14th century it also became a not uncommon practice to wear a kettle helmet over another smaller helmet like a skull cap or cervalier this obviating the need for a liner. This piece is done in the manner of a 14th c. kettle helmet. A lack of a liner does not necessarily indicate it is a fake, I cannot determine if any apparatus was installed for a chin strap, or some sort of method for tying it under the chin from the photos. As to the condition of the steel, while pitting can be faked, I've owned " dug " items from WWI that have been in the exact same shape so that's not necessarily a proof of being fake to me. The thing that does strike me as unusual is the rolled and counter sunk border of the brim of the helmet. This technique is something I associate with the 16th and 17th centuries, pretty much all actual armour I've seen from the 14th century has either outwardly rolled or non rolled edges. I've never seen a rolled and counter sunk edge from that period. Does this make it a fake, not necessarily, I learned long ago that since we're studying the left overs its very difficult to nail down exact periods for stuff as there seems to always be that one odd ball that pops up. Is this real or is it fake? I honestly can't say from just pictures, I would really need hands on time to have a better feel for it. My 2c. worth, take it for what its worth.
|
2nd May 2016, 01:04 PM | #3 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Regretfully the images that gave reason to this thread had to be deleted after problems reported by thread author.
Tolerance is requested from the participants in its discussion. |
2nd May 2016, 09:19 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Rhineland
Posts: 367
|
I am sorry for that. It won´t happen again!
Best regards Andreas |
8th May 2016, 08:27 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,058
|
I also noticed this helmet on Ebay Germany some weeks ago, I presume it to be a recent reproduction.
best, jasper |
10th May 2016, 03:00 PM | #6 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,204
|
Quote:
corrado26 |
|
|
|