|
|
|
8th September 2012, 11:49 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 12
|
Hello all,
I am rather a tenderfoot here and still a novice in collecting swords but I just wish to add something to this very interesting thread. Regarding Jean Marc's swords the discussion focus about smith's marks, shape of blades, ....this to identify origin and authenticity. So as a tenderfoot I ask a question...Does studying marks is enough in that case? I learned that the best way to identify the authenticity of a sword is to focus first on the patina and mainly on the remaining rust. How rust is, lamination, colors...? and I am surprised that this subject has not been touched on. Same thing with how the iron was worked, forged. Isn't it easier to counterfeit hallmarks than a blade and its patina? If anyone could give me an answer that will enlighten me. Thanks a lot Alain |
|
|
|
15th September 2012, 04:08 PM
|
#2 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
For a wonderfully detailed painting of 1533 showing early-16th. c. two-handed swords, please see:
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=16116 Best, Michael |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
