19th February 2011, 08:02 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,807
|
Barry taking on board what you say about it sometimes being hard to differentiate between tool and weapon. I have been doing a little more research.
All this is assuming that the item is not African. I did go for it on the feeling that it was not African, more something to do with the Pacific. The line marks make it hard to deny use as a weaving tool. But if we look at weaving in the Pacific and Melanesia, we could be lookig at an item from hundreds of small islands, like off the top of my head Tikopia. Then perhaps the item may have had a dual function. If a village were to suffer a suprise raid while all busy going about daily life and concetiating on weaving. You have a weapon in your hand. Here is a link that could add weight to the idea, scroll down to " Ethnographic evidence, Back strap loom " http://horizon.documentation.ird.fr/.../010020762.pdf This "Jstor" link is interesting but they always leave you halfway home. http://www.jstor.org/pss/3628663 Also I post an extract from "Melanesia, a short ethnography by B.A.L. Cranstone, The British Museum 1961 " As I say all assuming but could shed some light on why the item is so weapon like. |
|
|