![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
![]()
Another sword I am trying to identify. Bought this in with a lot of good modern made Islamic swords from the Shah Jahan's collection. The seller said it was Iranian. Obviously this is not modern. Single edge and a bit crude, but with an inlaid blade. 29" OAL. Just noticed abit of active rust. Going to get out my oil and some fine steel wool.
Any comments? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 175
|
![]()
Nice! Looks to be from Bhutan or possibly Tibet.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
![]() Quote:
thanks Lew, I knew that handle shape was familiar. Most I have seen have been more like the fancy one on Artzi'x site that you so kindly provided. I like both the ceremonial pieces and the battle veterans. Mine sure looks like a user. Quite sharp also. Any idea what it is called? Some particular variety or name? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Lew |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
![]()
Donald LaRocca, assoc. curator of arms and armor at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, has written a masterful catalog for the exhibition, "Warriors of the Himalayas: Rediscovering the Arms and Armor of Tibet" (NY: Metro. Mus. of Art / New Haven: Yale University, 2006). There is a rather fancy example of one of these swords, with its original scabbard (the one photographed on this thread has a modern replacement of non-traditional construction), identified as Bhutanese (cat. no. 73, p 171). Mr. LaRocca's notation states that such swords "are often found in southern and eastern Tibet".
The catalog doesn't provide the Bhutanese name for these weapons; I will attempt to contact a gentleman in Bhutan who was in touch with me a few years back (hope his email addie is still the same) ane will let you know what he says. The Tibetans who used these swords would probably have called them DPA' DAM, referring specifically to a long bladed sword with an oblique tip. The generic term for sword in Tibetan is "ral gri". See the glossary in the above-cited book for additional sword terms in Tibetan. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
![]()
Bill,
These Bhutanese swords are descended from the straight, single-edged backswords used in China and Korea during the medieval dynasties and which were also the basis for the very earliest swords in Japan. Blade contour is the same (although the Chinese/Korean versions have the ridge down each face of the blade which in Japan became the "shinogi" that you see on the typical "samurai sword". The construction of your hilt is pretty close to those on some of those Sino-Japanese types; see THE JAPANESE SWORD: IRON CRAFTSMANSHIP AND THE WARRIOR SPIRIT, Tokyo National Museum, 1997, cat. no. 29, 59, 60, 63. The fellow who sold you the sword was saying "Iranian" probably because single edged, oblique-tipped blades of very similar shape were known in the Middle East. An example of one of these very rare swords is cat. no. 71 in Unsal Yucel, ISLAMIC SWORDS AND SWORDSMITHS, Istanbul: IRCICA, 2001. That blade is attributed to the Mamluk ruler Qansuh al-Ghawri, 1501-1517. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
![]() Quote:
So very good to hear from you again! I have ordered the cat you recommended and already have "Islamic Swords..." On the way from a previous order. I will look check these references. Thank you for the great information! Bill |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 987
|
![]()
One of the nicest features of Bhutanese swords, in my opinion, is the hairpin folding pattern in the blades. Such a pattern is faintly visible in yours under the patina and rust. If you are not averse to restoration (versus conservation), you might want to have it polished a bit and etched to bring out the pattern.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kernersville, NC, USA
Posts: 793
|
![]()
There is a Bhutanese sword called a Patang. It's similar to the Tibetan Ke Tri. This may be a Patang. Or Patang may be the general word in Bhutan for sword.
Steve Edit: Oh, forgot to say, VERY NICE! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
![]() Quote:
A little 600 grit and WD40 should help. Then 1500 if it does not make it too muddy. Thanks Steve also! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
![]()
Mr. Ferguson
Thanks for the Bhutanese name. Do you speak the language? If so, could you share with us please some other sword terms (i.e. for the various parts, styles, etc.)? As re your use of the term "ke tri" for the Tibetan sword, I know that it's used in an article on the subject here on this site. However when I used it when discussing it with Tibetan sword guru Donald LaRocca of the Met (he curated the recent exhibition mentioned above and has studied the Tibetan language for years), he advised me that "ke tri" is not the correct term. I was told that "ral gri" or "gri" is the standard generic name for the weapon (the latter also is used in prior academic books, in particular Siegbert Hummel's TIBETISCHES KUNSTHANDWERK IN METALL). I would suggest that if terminology interests you, that you order a copy of the Met's exhibit catalog, and enjoy the extensive glossary that Don has compiled. It even has each entry spelled in the Tibetan script, and is well cross-referenced. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
![]()
Bill, you're most welcome. Thanks again for sharing such an interesting piece with us!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
![]()
Hi, Dajak
Thanks for the link. I've seen this before, Rob Miller at Liongate sent it to me for a look-see. Doesn't appear to be Bhutanese. Handle is vaguely similar in profile, but the way it's made and assembled is not. Blade shape and the lamination of the steel on his example is atypical for the region, as is the short ricasso at the forte which seems inspired by a European bayonet or military sword. As far as what this piece actually is, I don't know. But it doesn't fit the parameters of Bhutanese sword design. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kernersville, NC, USA
Posts: 793
|
![]()
Philip, Unfortunately, one word is the extent of my Bhutanese.
![]() Thanks so much for the correct terminolgy of the Tibetan sword. I much prefer to use the words that the people of the region would use. Steve |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 371
|
![]()
Hi Bill
it is interesting to note the similarities in the guard, the collar throat and the handle between your piece and the more common Butanese daggers like the one attached. drd |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: College Park, MD
Posts: 186
|
![]()
Bill, an interesting sword. I'm jealous. I think the most interesting things are the differences from the most common patags. First, the inlay seems uncommon. While the milled or reeded (brass?) band at the base of the hilt is typical, the way the characteristically octagonal-section grip swells there, with "shoulders" parallel to the blade, is indeed more like some knives than the typical grip with a convex curve all around. The pommel is unusual in its simplicity compared to many I have seen (although I have one that has a simple, octagonal nickel-silver cap), as many swords have the typical pierced-work "gubor." It resembles some simple, southeastern Tibetan steel pommels in a general hexagonal shape and in the provision of two small holes through which to pass a thong or lanyard.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
![]() Quote:
I just received my copy of this incredible book. I cannot recommend it too highly. It is a "must have" and even if people are not studying this area, a wonderful read. I believe that you did some writing for the Met? Best Bill Thank you again for letting us know about it! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|