![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: India
Posts: 77
|
![]()
Hi All...
Wish you a very happy new year...!!! Mine has been a special one...!!! Some snaps attached.. Pardon the quality of the snaps. These were taken in a jiffy. All comments on age and provenance solicited... Regards, Bhushan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: OKLAHOMA, USA
Posts: 3,138
|
![]()
QUITE A NICE SELECTION AND A GREAT START FOR THE NEW YEAR.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: India
Posts: 77
|
![]()
Thank you Vandoo..
Any comments on the age or style? The longer Firangi is 49 inches in length and is also double edged. The smaller one in 45 inches and has a bit of the silver pommel cap intact. Part of it is broken away. It Also has a series of dot like punch marks near the base of the blade. Does that mean anything? I'm particularly curious to hear comments on the Dhal - shield. It shows some definite age and wrapping. It also has a hole (bullet?) on it. I'm not sure of the hide. The tulwar -- could it be termed as a sosun pata? The seller was over zealous and has machine cleaned it. Is there a way to restore the older look? Regards, Bhushan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
Hi Bhushan,
Yes it is a pity when dealers cleans a weapon, he should leave it to the buyer. To my opinion it is a sosusn pata with a blade in the style used in Deccan and the south. The blade form is very old. Could you show a picture of the dot marks on the blade? Dot marks were used in several places, but are mostly known from Bikaner. So depending on what they look like they could have been made there. Jens |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: AUCKLAND,NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 624
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|