|
9th February 2006, 03:55 AM
|
#61 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 473
|
Those are beautiful Jeff!
I am not sure how to classify either blade, neither looks like "classic" sham. They do appear similar to 19th century patterns from Persia and India. Can I ask is this from modern steel? Do you know the S content? You certainly have me scratching my head! Jeff |
|
|
|
9th February 2006, 04:48 AM
|
#62 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 189
|
Thanks, they are modern steel, photo # 1 is about five years old, photo #2 is just a couple months. Sulfur is 0.02%, I think, I am away from my records right now, I'll double check when I get home.
I'm scratching my head, too - another decade or two of experiments, and I *might* have an idea of how modern and classic wootz blades compare, and what it all means. First blade was etched in Ferric chloride, second in ferrous sulfate. |
|
|
|
|
9th February 2006, 10:00 AM
|
#63 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 31
|
Thank you, Gt Obach
what a great forum and discussion! Amazing!
 How could I come to be a fast learner? I think I need some basic materials,books and samples.  who can help me out??? I love this place. |
|
|
|
|
9th February 2006, 03:14 PM
|
#64 | |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,336
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
11th February 2006, 07:55 PM
|
#65 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 655
|
edited out
Last edited by Rivkin; 12th February 2006 at 06:30 AM. |
|
|
|
|
12th February 2006, 01:06 AM
|
#66 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 655
|
edited out
Last edited by Rivkin; 12th February 2006 at 06:30 AM. |
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
